Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Wednesday November 20 2019, @05:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the save-the-plant-collect-the-whole-set dept.

Have you ever wondered what happens when you put plastic in the recycling bin for collection? It probably goes straight into the garbage tip with the rest of the trash. Up to a short time ago, countries like China offered a decent price for usable plastic, but those deals have dried up, leaving many countries with millions of tonnes of plastic and few solutions to deal with it.

Now, Australian company Licella says it has created a system that can recycle all types of plastic, even to the extent of creating oil that can be turned into bitumen, petrol or back into different kinds of plastics.

His Catalytic Hydrothermal Reactor (Cat-HTR) does just that through a form of chemical recycling that changes the plastics at a molecular level using hot water at a high pressure to turn them back into oil.

[...] Dr Humphreys said the Cat-HTR technology he and his co-founder patented was different from existing plastic-to-oil technologies like pyrolysis, which is a process that involves heating materials at a very high temperature.

Unlike traditional physical recycling, it does not require plastics to be separated according to type and colour, and can recycle anything from milk cartons to wetsuits and even wood by-products.

It also means plastic products can be recycled again and again.

But he said the bigger problem to address is our over-consumption of plastic.

The process of turning rubbish into fuel may sound familiar to sci-fi fans. In the film Back to the Future the time machine car uses garbage as fuel.

The industry has been widely described as in crisis, with a[n Australian] Senate report last year stating that "enormous quantities of recycled material, particularly materials collected through kerbside recycling, are now being stockpiled at great risk to the health and safety of local communities. Moreover, quantities of otherwise recyclable material are being sent to landfill".


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Zinho on Wednesday November 20 2019, @07:07PM

    by Zinho (759) on Wednesday November 20 2019, @07:07PM (#922538)

    If the processes exist to recycle the material then a good way to achieve this result is to ensure that the purchase price of a product covers the costs of recycling (this can be accomplished in several different ways). This has two main benefits: first, the material can be recycled which should reduce the proportion of that material which ends up in landfills; and second, it provides an economic incentive for everyone to reduce the amount of waste material in the first place.

    Agreed on the incentive to not purchase recyclables. Like tariffs, recycling surcharges at time of purchase would make non-plastic packaging more attractive to the consumer on a cost basis.

    Using the tax base to pay for recycling does not really provide anyone with an incentive to actually reduce waste, so I would suggest it is not going to be as effective.

    Also agreed; if there is no incentive/penalty at the time of disposal then the consumer may simply absorb the tax as part of normal inflation and continue to send plastic to the landfill. I've heard that Norway is successful at encouraging separation of compostables from other waste via a hefty fine. Glass/metal/paper are also separated from the waste stream, and there are recycling drops on nearly every street corner to make dropoff easy; not sure if there are fines on those. I do know that several municipalities incinerate their waste, converting it to electrical power for a profit; the fines on mixing wet waste with dry is justified by pointing out that it poisons the incinerator and reduces the effectiveness of the burn.

    TL; DR:
    I think you're right that there are business cases for processes like this. It requires public goodwill and the right regulatory framework, so mileage may vary by community.

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2