Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday November 22 2019, @07:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the artificial-islands-part-of-real-dispute dept.

US warships sail in disputed South China Sea amid tensions

Navy warships have sailed near islands claimed by China in the disputed South China Sea twice in the past few days, the United States military told Reuters on Thursday, at a time of tension between the world's two largest economies.

The busy waterway is one of a number of flashpoints in the US-China relationship, which include a trade war, US sanctions, Hong Kong and Taiwan.

Earlier this week during high-level talks, China called on the US military to stop flexing its muscles in the South China Sea and adding "new uncertainties" over democratic Taiwan, which is seen as a wayward province and claimed by China.

[...] On Wednesday, the littoral combat ship Gabrielle Giffords travelled within 12 nautical miles of Mischief Reef[*], Commander Reann Mommsen, a spokeswoman for the US Navy's Seventh Fleet, told Reuters.

On Thursday, the destroyer Wayne E. Meyer challenged restrictions on innocent passage in the Paracel islands[**], Mommsen said.

"These missions are based in the rule of law and demonstrate our commitment to upholding the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea and airspace guaranteed to all nations," she added.

[...] China claims almost all the energy-rich waters of the South China Sea, where it has established military outposts on artificial islands.

However, Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam also have claims to parts of the sea.

The United States accuses China of militarising the South China Sea and trying to intimidate Asian neighbours who might want to exploit its extensive oil and gas reserves.

[*] Mischief Reef
[**] Paracel Islands


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 22 2019, @07:53PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 22 2019, @07:53PM (#923490)

    All of that area had been under control of imperial Japan, including Korea and China and the Philippines. It was Japanese by conquest. (if that isn't legit, then large parts of most modern nations aren't legit, so don't go there)

    With the defeat of Japan, that area belonged to the USA.

    The USA split out the parts as separate countries, but really didn't take the South China Sea seriously. We never specified who got it. The answer would be "nobody", except that there are some tiny islands that legally are considered land. Without those islands, it'd just be international water. With the islands, it can belong to somebody. The USA never specified who.

    If the USA wanted to liven things up, it could make a claim that the islands were never given away. They are USA. That would be inconsistent with our history of treating it as international water, but who cares? We should do that, because China is asshoe.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Friday November 22 2019, @08:21PM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Friday November 22 2019, @08:21PM (#923500) Journal

    I mean usually "by conquest" loses it's de facto legitimacy when you immediately proceed to lose a war.