SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the common-sense-should-trump-greed dept.
Submitted via IRC for Bytram
DOD joins fight against 5G spectrum proposal, citing risks to GPS
The Department of Defense has weighed in against a proposal before the Federal Communications Commission to open the 1 to 2 Gigahertz frequency range—the L band—for use in 5G cellular networks. The reason: segments of that range of radio spectrum are already used by Global Positioning System signals and other military systems.
In a letter to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper pressed for the rejection of the proposal by Ligado Networks (formerly known as LightSquared), saying, "There are too many unknowns and the risks are far too great to federal operations to allow Ligado's proposed system to proceed... This could have a significant negative impact on military operations, both in peacetime and war."
The FCC has already largely brushed aside similar opposition from NASA, the US Navy, and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, among others, over another spectrum block in the 24GHz range—which is used by weather satellites for remote monitoring of water vapor. But comments are still being collected on the Ligado plan for sharing the 1675 to 1680MHz block of the L Band. Pai has been supportive of the plan because that range is adjacent to the existing 1670 to 1675MHz block already in use for wireless services.
GPS signals use several blocks of the L band, including a primary channel centered on 1575.42MHz. GPS uses L band signals because of their ability to penetrate cloud cover, rain, and vegetation. The L band is also used by the DOD for a number of other purposes, including tactical air navigation, landing assistance telemetry, Identify Friend or Foe (IFF) signals, and missile range and aircraft telemetry—though the DOD has already had to move some of these applications further up the spectrum range to make room for previous "commercial reallocation."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 26 2019, @09:13AM
It's been what? 20 years? And still no idea what your data privacy is about?? It's not about getting "real time information" from *you*. It has never been about that. No one cares about *you*.
The purpose is to store all this information for future reference so in case you become more than "insignificant", then someone can look and immediately see where you went, what are your daily habits, where you shop, when you get back home, whom you come in contact with... etc. etc.
No one cares about snooping on the entire population. Even the Chinese massive surveillance system doesn't spy on all people - it has to filter out the more interesting people they want to concentrate on, not all.