SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the paranoia-or-shrewd-planning? dept.
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
[...] But in the US and UK the rollout of 5G networks has been hampered by an international row over one of the most important suppliers of 5G equipment, China's Huawei.
Industry analysts like Edison Lee, an analyst from financial services group Jefferies, see the US pressure on Huawei as an attempt to break China's potential dominance of the global 5G market.
"The tech war is based on America's argument that China's technological advances have been built upon stolen intellectual property rights, and heavy government subsidies, and their belief that Chinese telecom equipment is not safe, and is a national security threat to the US and its allies," he says.
"As Huawei and [fellow Chinese firm] ZTE increasingly dominate the global telecom equipment market, the western world will be more vulnerable to Chinese spying," Lee adds.
Huawei has always strongly denied that its technology can be used for spying. While western nations worry about one of the key suppliers of 5G technology, China is racing ahead with its 5G rollout. On 31 October Chinese telecom companies launched 5G services in more than 50 Chinese cities, creating one of the world's largest 5G networks. Huawei has built an estimated 50% of the network.
[...] Industry analysts are not confident that the row between China and the US will be sorted out anytime soon.
"We see the current tensions as a technological Cold War, as tech nationalism intensifies," says Ben Wood, chief of research, at CCS Insight.
"With the Chinese government firmly committed to establishing China as a world-leading 5G nation, the opportunity for Huawei in its home market is immense.
"However, the rest of the world can't afford to get left behind, and without access to Huawei infrastructure US mobile network operators in particular will need to rely on alternative suppliers who may be more expensive and less advanced with 5G."
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 27 2019, @01:53PM
I think we lack a phrase for distinguishing between conspiracy theories.
For instance it is literally a conspiracy theory that Epstein was killed. But when you look at the evidence (guards somehow stop checking in at exact time he offs himself, cellmate inexplicably removed, camera in front of cell inexplicably malfunctioning, removed from suicide watch after being evaluated by shrink, other prisoners report hearing screaming the morning of his death, broken neck bones more consistent with homicidal strangulation, motive, etc, etc) then there's an extremely strong case for the view that he was murdered. In my opinion the weight of evidence makes it more probable, but that's not necessarily required. The point is that there's a lot of concrete evidence strongly supporting it.
Your conspiracy theory here, by contrast, is seemingly based on nothing but speculation and fantasy. I actually think the real deal here is Merkel has a sextape between her and Trump. She's constantly been threatening to release it which would have no less effect than a nuclear strike as millions of people would drop dead at such a sight. In an effort to undermine the United States and strengthen the EU, she's demanded Trump get into an unwinnable economic war with China of which this ban is a component. America weakens, EU strengthens, checkmate and Heil Führer Merkel! Prost!