Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday December 11 2019, @05:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the unexpected-results dept.

After Bone Marrow Transplant, Man's Semen Contains Only Donor's DNA

Chris Long is an IT worker in the Washoe County Sheriff's Department in Reno, Nevada. But all the DNA in his semen belongs to a German man he's never met.

That's because Long received a bone marrow transplant from the European stranger four years ago [...] Following the procedure, the healthy blood-forming cells from the donor replaced Long's unhealthy cells, allowing his body to resume normal blood production. It makes sense, then, for Long's blood to contain the DNA of his donor.

[...] Sometimes, they find both Long's DNA and his donor's [...] when they test swabs from his lip, cheek, and tongue. Samples of his chest and head hair, meanwhile, show only Long's DNA.

But perhaps most surprisingly, four years after the procedure, samples of Long's semen show only his donor's DNA.

[...] Three bone marrow transplant experts consulted by the NYT all agreed that it would be impossible for the procedure to result in a recipient producing sperm containing their donor's DNA.


Mehrdad Abedi, the doctor who treated Long at the University of California, Davis, meanwhile, told the newspaper that his patient's surprising semen is likely due to the fact that Long had a vasectomy after his second child was born.

Forensic scientists already have to grapple with the issue of DNA from innocent people occasionally showing up at crime scenes due to bone marrow transplants. But at least in those cases, they have the "right" DNA to trace, too.

If someone in Long's situation committed a sex crime and investigators collected semen samples, though, could their blood marrow donor be charged with the crime given the lack of any other DNA at the scene?

Hopefully investigators understand that sperm and semen are different things. Blood marrow donors should have adequate records of their donor status.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday December 11 2019, @06:13PM (4 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 11 2019, @06:13PM (#931153) Journal

    You must have not checked the SPOILER.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 11 2019, @06:30PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 11 2019, @06:30PM (#931160)

    I read it, it says he had a vasectomy. That is like bombing all the bridges to enemy territory in order to deny access to your own spermen troops, meanwhile the transplanted spermen are like paratroops airdropping in through the bloodstream.

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday December 11 2019, @06:46PM (2 children)

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 11 2019, @06:46PM (#931167) Journal

      From TFA . . .

      Three bone marrow transplant experts consulted by the NYT all agreed that it would be impossible for the procedure to result in a recipient producing sperm containing their donor's DNA.

      The reason his semen (not sperm) has only donor DNA is because there are no sperm in the semen. If there were sperm in the semen, the sperm would have his own DNA while the semen would have the donor's DNA. Thus two sets of DNA would be detected in the semen.

      --
      To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 11 2019, @07:55PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 11 2019, @07:55PM (#931201)

        So they didn't check for donor spermen?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 11 2019, @10:25PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 11 2019, @10:25PM (#931242)

        Geez, that explanation was very good. It would have really helped if that was in the summary and not hidden in a SPOILER tag. What's up with that?