Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Thursday December 12 2019, @03:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the hello-chucky dept.

It seems to come around quicker every year – the failure of so-called smart toys to meet the most basic of security requirements. Which? has discovered a bunch of sack fillers that dirtbags can use to chat to your kids this Christmas.

Back in 2017, the consumer group found toys with security problems relating to network connections, apps or other interactive features. The results of its latest round of testing show manufacturers are struggling to improve standards.

Working with security researchers NCC Group, Which? found a karaoke machine that could transmit audio from anyone passing within Bluetooth range because of its unsecured connection. It found walkie-talkies from VTech which anyone with their own set of similar equipment could connect to over a 200-metre range. It also found a Mattel-backed games portal which appeared to be unmoderated, allowing users to upload their own games with content inappropriate for children.

Ken Munro, security researcher with consultancy Pen Test Partners, said that although there was no evidence the vulnerabilities revealed by Which? had not been used by nefarious characters to contact children, parents should still beware of toys that do not meet minimum standards.

"The reason we don't hear of these attacks is they are local: it would be one parent at a time. Is it still worrying? Yes, I don't like the idea of this thing being unsecured," he said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 12 2019, @09:10PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 12 2019, @09:10PM (#931536)

    DoD banned Furbies ~20 years ago anywhere in the building because they had some kind of a learning ability. They thought they could have been used for spying even though they weren't Internet connected.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Friday December 13 2019, @02:28AM

    by krishnoid (1156) on Friday December 13 2019, @02:28AM (#931604)

    So many reasons to ban -- and buy [queenofwands.net] them.

  • (Score: 2) by sjames on Friday December 13 2019, @03:37AM

    by sjames (2882) on Friday December 13 2019, @03:37AM (#931622) Journal

    The deeper story is more that they feared it would be too easy to undetectably modify a Furby to act as a spying device. Understandably, they have a bit of an aversion to anything microphone like that they haven't thoroughly vetted, and that much effort wasn't worth it just to allow toys in the building.