Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday December 15 2019, @01:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the I'll-think-about-it dept.

A sobering message about the future at AI's biggest party

Blaise Aguera y Arcas praised the revolutionary technique known as deep learning that has seen teams like his get phones to recognize faces and voices. He also lamented the limitations of that technology, which involves designing software called artificial neural networks that can get better at a specific task by experience or seeing labeled examples of correct answers.

"We're kind of like the dog who caught the car," Aguera y Arcas said. Deep learning has rapidly knocked down some longstanding challenges in AI—but doesn't immediately seem well suited to many that remain. Problems that involve reasoning or social intelligence, such as weighing up a potential hire in the way a human would, are still out of reach, he said. "All of the models that we have learned how to train are about passing a test or winning a game with a score [but] so many things that intelligences do aren't covered by that rubric at all," he said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday December 15 2019, @05:04PM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Sunday December 15 2019, @05:04PM (#932414) Homepage
    > the excess profits generated by Ford's assembly line business enabled them to steam-roller Ferrari on the world racing stage (using intelligence+virtually unlimited resources) in a matter of just a few years.

    One time in the last 60 years that has happened, I'm guessing you've just seen the publicity for the recent movie, and that's being pushed as some "USA! USA!" chest-thumping exercise.

    But those and other "Ford" things weren't even made by Ford at all. Most of them bought in UK tech such as Lola and Cosworth.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 16 2019, @01:59AM (1 child)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday December 16 2019, @01:59AM (#932627)

    One time in the last 60 years that has happened, I'm guessing you've just seen the publicity for the recent movie, and that's being pushed as some "USA! USA!" chest-thumping exercise.

    No, the real USA USA chest thumping exercise is Apollo, from the same era is Apollo - there again, cost no object, we outspent the Russians, came from behind and beat them to the prize: "We went in peace, for all mankind." Truer words were never spoken: we demonstrated conclusively that MAD truly assured mutual destruction, thereby averting WW-III which, undoubtedly could have been terrible for all mankind.

    IMO, we (the USA) been on greased skids to the cesspit ever since.

    you've just seen the publicity for the recent movie

    No, actually, I've seen both the movie and the more informative documentary on Netflix, and yes, credit where credit is due: Everything America is, particularly the imperialistic native abusing expansionist parts, we owe to dear old mother England. A fun point that they made in the documentary much more clearly than the movie was that Ford had already destroyed Ferrari before, with the B29s they made in WW-II which were used to bomb Modena, including the Ferrari factories, into oblivion.

    As for what made the GT-40s lethal at LeMans, the chassis and other know-how may have largely been sourced from England - all is fair in war and racing, but the real unbeatable ingredient were the god-awful over powered (too heavy for their own good) seven liter powerplants. England made some fine engines for aircraft in the war, but I don't think they had the balls to use such things for road racing, at least not in the 1960s.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday December 16 2019, @02:57AM

      by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Monday December 16 2019, @02:57AM (#932659) Homepage
      And credit where credit is due - the "UK" know-how and chops at that time were significantly propped up by kiwis.

      Hell, I still cheer for a team with a New Zealander's name.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves