Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Monday December 16 2019, @04:03AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-ready-for-prime-time dept.

Lofty promises for autonomous cars unfulfilled

The first driverless cars were supposed to be deployed on the roads of American cities in 2019, but just a few days before the end of the year, the lofty promises of car manufacturers and Silicon Valley remain far from becoming reality.

Recent accidents, such as those involving Tesla cars equipped with Autopilot, a driver assistance software, have shown that "the technology is not ready," said Dan Albert, critic and author of the book "Are We There Yet?" on the history of the American automobile.

He questioned the optimistic sales pitch that autonomous cars would help reduce road deaths—40,000 every year in the United States, mostly due to human error—because these vehicles themselves have caused deaths.

As a result, self-driving maneuvers in the technology-laden vehicles are limited to parking, braking, starting or driving in a parking lot.

[...] "Automation may be used in areas such as closed campuses, where speeds are low and there is little or no interaction with other vehicles, pedestrians or cyclists or inclement weather," said Sam Abuelsamid, engineer and expert at Navigant Research.

The big problem is "perception": the software's ability to process data sent by the motion sensors to detect other vehicles, pedestrians, animals, cyclists or other objects, and then predict their likely actions and adapt accordingly, he said.

And that part is key, said Avideh Zakhor, engineering and computer science professor at the University of California-Berkeley.

"The perception part is not solved yet. The most advanced publicly available is 80-85 percent (reliable). That means that 15 percent of the time, it's going to hit objects and kill and destroy them," she said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday December 16 2019, @05:06AM (12 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 16 2019, @05:06AM (#932698) Journal

    Blame Tesla
    ...
    Incomplete partially driverless technology, criticized from the start for not being ready, is the most visible implementation and dragging down everyone else.

    Easy, tak, that's close to "blame X for burning down the idea of true communism" type of argument.
    Better to take your time and first be sure the autonomous driving is actually achievable. 'Case, see? Been already... how many year and $zillion poured into such projects with little to show so far?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday December 16 2019, @05:22AM (3 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday December 16 2019, @05:22AM (#932699) Journal

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-27/driverless-cars-promise-a-victoria-without-crashes/10428760 [abc.net.au]

    Australia's transport ministers have set a national goal of having regulation in place by 2020 to support the commercial introduction of autonomous vehicles.

    [...] Roos, trams pose challenge to driverless technology

    It's not just the technology. Bureaucracy and roos have to be dealt with.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 3, Funny) by c0lo on Monday December 16 2019, @05:44AM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 16 2019, @05:44AM (#932703) Journal

      >blockquote>It's not just the technology. Bureaucracy and roos have to be dealt with.

      Heh, you don't feel like listening to the lessons of the history, do you?

      "First they came for bureaucrats and and I did not speak out because I was not a bureaucrat.

      Then they came for the roos, and...."

      (grin)

       

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @06:55AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @06:55AM (#932721)

      Kangaroos have user stories too ..

      The Australian Army developed a new helicopter flight simulator that would replicate the unique environment of fighting in the Outback. It would replicate weather patterns (hence why my friend who's a meterologist for the U.S. Air Force was shown this) and the wildlife of the Outback. The Australian Army proudly invited American observers from the US Army and US Air Force for the unveiling of this new flight simulator.

      Everything was going well. The pilot in the simulator was flying through the paces. The computer was performing perfectly. The simulations were behaving correctly. Like when the helicopter flew up over a ridge, it disturbed a mob of kangaroos. As a mob of Kangaroos will do when approached suddenly by a loud helicopter, they scattered like a flock of birds. Soldiers can observe the behavior of animals to detect an ambush.

      It was perfect. And then the helicopter got shot down by a surface-to-air missile. But there was nothing alive on the screen except that mob of kangaroos. The missile trajectory was traced and discovered that the roos had fired the missile!

      It turned out upon examination of the program that the programmers had cut some corners. They cut and pasted the infantry module for the kangaroos, and only changed the icon. Infantry, like a mob of kangaroos, would scatter when suddenly approached by a helicopter. They forgot to consider that unlike kangaroos, the infantry will regroup and get out their missile launchers. But this was after the observers had left Australia with a great respect for Australia's wildlife vowing they should never try invading Australia.

      https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/964834 [erepublik.com]

      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday December 16 2019, @07:49AM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 16 2019, @07:49AM (#932733) Journal

        Yeap - that's Ozland.

        The kangaroos will kill you with missiles, if the weather, geography, flora and the rest of fauna doesn't get you first.
        The fact that kangaroos never get to fire missiles speaks volumes about the efficiency of the first lines of defense.

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @05:25AM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @05:25AM (#932700)

    Easy c0lo, that's close to "if we haven't done it yet, we never will" type of argument. There can be all sorts of technological advances or outright paradigm shifts that can enable many things. Otherwise, people would have given up on rockets to the moon, quantum computers, airplanes, etc. I mean how many years and $zillion were poured into such, until they finally worked and just improved from there?

    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday December 16 2019, @05:39AM (6 children)

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 16 2019, @05:39AM (#932702) Journal

      Easy c0lo, that's close to "if we haven't done it yet, we never will" type of argument.

      Close, but not exact. In any case, my assertion** is closer to reality than the position of "Blame Tesla for the current perception of over-promise and under-deliver"

      ---

      ** "More difficult that initial estimated" => "don't hold your breath, cause if you do, for sure it won't happen in your life-time. Otherwise, it may or may not happen in your life time, but that's because the difficulty of the problem, not because of the lack of trying or because some scapegoat".

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @07:46AM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @07:46AM (#932730)

        That isn't my position, but mistaking me for the OP is understandable. Regardless, I also doubt I'll see it in my lifetime, but then again I am sort of old. I do think that my children will see limited use of self-driving cars. Things like follow truck convoys on controlled-access roadways to get around driving restrictions. Driving on uncontrolled city streets is probably a pipe dream even in my grandkids time, barring some sort of paradigm or other unforeseen change.

        • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday December 16 2019, @07:59AM (2 children)

          by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 16 2019, @07:59AM (#932737) Journal

          but mistaking me for the OP is understandable.

          If you look closer, I never attributed to you the position of the OP.
          I just made my position clearer (I hope) - not Tesla but the problem's difficulty is to blame; given that, noone should expect a full/proper solution soon

          --
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
          • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @10:29PM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @10:29PM (#933046)

            You are right. The denotation definitely didn't but the connotation did. At least for me. But it might also have something to with the fact my screen reader starts to sound sarcastic after awhile due to its flat tone.

            • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday December 16 2019, @10:55PM

              by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 16 2019, @10:55PM (#933065) Journal

              my screen reader starts to sound sarcastic after awhile due to its flat tone.

              If that's not quip material, I don't know what else is.

              --
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
      • (Score: 4, Interesting) by MostCynical on Monday December 16 2019, @11:15AM (1 child)

        by MostCynical (2589) on Monday December 16 2019, @11:15AM (#932791) Journal

        Mr Musk is, primarily, as salesman.

        Do all salesmen lie? Black swan territory for most of us - as I doubt any would have met any that don't lie (capabilities, speed, delivery date, availability, configurability, integration, cost... pick all of the list)

        However, that one salesman has managed to make electric vehicles an available, viable (for the consumer) option for private transport is quite remarkable.

        That he convinced his customers to also be beta testers for new features is even more. Many (most?) of the Tesla crashes seem to be from over-confidence (or just stupidity) on the part of the person in the driver's seat

        If people didn't buy what salesmen sell, we'd probably all be subsistence farmers using rocks and blunt sticks to defend ourselves.

        Hype wins - especially when something like the P100D S and X types exist, and have dragged all the world's manufacturers along with them.

        --
        "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
        • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday December 16 2019, @02:34PM

          by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 16 2019, @02:34PM (#932845) Journal

          If people didn't buy what salesmen sell, we'd probably all be subsistence farmers using rocks and blunt sticks to defend ourselves.

          Hype wins - especially when something like the P100D S and X types exist, and have dragged all the world's manufacturers along

          I think you misspelled "engineers" (Thomas Watt and Richard Trevithick) and "chemists" (Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch) as the ones responsible to industrial and, respectively, agricultural revolutions.

          --
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford