Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday December 16 2019, @07:36AM   Printer-friendly

In other words, what happens when a population suddenly stops taking fluoride in their drinking water, like Juneau's citizenry did?

Now, thanks to a recent study led by first author and public health researcher Jennifer Meyer from the University of Alaska Anchorage, we've got new insights into the subsequent effects.

In the study, Meyer assessed Medicaid dental claim billing records for two groups of children and adolescents aged 18 or under.

One of these groups represented what the researchers call "optimal" community water fluoridation (CWF) exposure: 853 non-adult patients on behalf of whom Medicaid dental claims were filed in 2003, years before the fluoride cessation began in 2007.

The other group was made up of 1,052 non-adult patients from families who similarly met Medicaid income requirements, and who made the same kind of dental claims almost a decade later, in 2012.

[...] "By taking the fluoride out of the water supply... the trade-off for that is children are going to experience one additional caries procedure per year, at a ballpark (cost) of US$300 more per child," Meyer explained to KTOO News.

Source: https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-what-happened-when-a-city-in-alaska-took-fluoride-out-of-its-drinking-water

Reference: Jennifer Meyer, Vasileios Margaritis & Aaron Mendelsohn, Consequences of community water fluoridation cessation for Medicaid-eligible children and adolescents in Juneau, Alaska, BMC Oral Health, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0684-2


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @10:44AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @10:44AM (#932780)

    Nope, that number is meant to exaggerate the result, the $300 value is rounded up from $250 and not adjusted for inflation (not even CPI).

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by nitehawk214 on Monday December 16 2019, @04:11PM (1 child)

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Monday December 16 2019, @04:11PM (#932882)

    Fuck the dollar amount. 1 cavity per year is the alarming figure.

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
    • (Score: 0, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @04:59PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 16 2019, @04:59PM (#932905)

      Yea, well it isn't one cavity per year either. Look at the data and interpret it that way. That means on average people in Juneau had about 36 cavities by the time they are 18. And that is the same with or without fluoride.

      So that is not what the number means. The people who wrote this paper have no idea what they are doing.