Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday December 17 2019, @10:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the interesting-development dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow4408

In May this year, users of popular open source project FUSE for macOS noticed the source code for the latest update was missing. The project had become closed source and was no longer free for commercial use. But as The Reg discovered when we had a talk with its maintainer, there was a very good reason for that – and it's not a good look for the many companies that used it.

[...]FUSE for macOS 3.9 can still be freely bundled with commercial software. Then in July of 2019, I released FUSE for macOS 3.10 with support for macOS Catalina under the new, less permissive licence, that requires specific written permission to bundle FUSE with commercial software," he told The Reg.

[...] How is this possible? "Most of the FUSE for macOS source code is released under the BSD licence. However, libfuse, for example, is released under the LGPL. I did what other developers of closed source FUSE forks have been doing for some time. The BSD licence has no copyleft, which means that no one is required to push changes upstream or make them available. As libfuse is covered under the LGPL, changes to it need to be made available, while changes to the kernel code can be kept closed," Fleischer explains.

The outcome? "After the licence change I have been contacted by several companies and negotiated some licence agreements. In this very regard closing the source code of FUSE was a success. In the very least it helped to raise awareness to the difficulties of sustainable open source software development," he said.

Fleischer added that: "I do not like continuing working on FUSE as a closed source project. It has been a hard decision and I have been thinking about it for a very long time, but I stand by it and it seemed to be the only option left to raise awareness and ensure the project's future."

He acknowledges though that: "I have not been very transparent about the licence change."

Source: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/12/16/fuse_macos_closed_source/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 17 2019, @03:22PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 17 2019, @03:22PM (#933291)

    FUSE allows unprivileged users to mount filesystems of their choice without impacting the system's overall security (i.e. without running kernel code). Only that user can access the filesystem, so there's no risk of causing stability issues for root or other users. FUSE isn't used for things like root filesystems, it's used for mounting a giant archive you want to access, but not waste space unpacking; or fetching files over an unusual network protocol.

    I use FUSE on my HTPC to get multimedia over HTTP from my server in the basement. It uses nginx's built-in directory indexing. Writing rohttpfs was easier than installing webdav. The most common point of failure is not the filesystem, but the network going down, and the filesystem fails gracefully when that happens.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3