Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday January 03 2020, @08:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the sounds-cough-about-wheeze-right dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Researchers from King's have carried out the first study of microplastics in the atmosphere in London to determine what people within the city might be exposed to and where this comes from.

In the study published today in Environment International, they found that microplastics are present in the air in London at higher abundances than any other major city examined so far. Their findings indicate that cities are a likely source of microplastics to the wider environment with the weather and meteorological patterns having little influence on their abundance in this urban environment.

[...] They found that:

  • Microplastics were present in every sample taken in London and greater than previously reported by any other study.
  • Levels of microplastics were higher in London compared to Dongguan, China and Paris, France and Hamburg, Germany.
  • Levels of microplastics in London are almost 20 times greater than in the French Pyrenees when comparing particles of the same size.
  • 92% were fibrous microplastics that come from the wear down of plastic textiles including clothing, upholstery and carpets.
  • The other sources include fragments from larger plastic products, films from thin plastic items such as disposable plastic bags and foam from polystyrene items.
  • Microplastics can become airborne and travel as far as 95 km by the wind however local sources have a greater influence on deposition in central London.

Lead author Dr. Stephanie Wright, UKRI Rutherford Fellow in the School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences at King's said: "We found some of the highest reported levels of microplastics in atmospheric dust, with local sources appearing influential. Fibres were the most abundant for the size range we looked at, mirroring the marine environment. From where microplastics are emitted and for how long they are airborne remain unknown but are key for understanding long-range transport potential to the wider environment. An important next step in predicting risk is to estimate human exposure to airborne microplastics."

Although the impact of microplastics on humans is still relatively unknown, occupational studies indicate that workers exposed to very high levels of plastic dust suffer chronic inflammation of the airway, in some (worst) cases interstitial lung disease and tissue scarring. Despite not all sources of microplastics being known and the impact on human health, the authors suggest there can be ways to mitigate your exposure.

More information: S.L. Wright et al. Atmospheric microplastic deposition in an urban environment and an evaluation of transport, Environment International (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105411


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 03 2020, @09:57AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 03 2020, @09:57AM (#939013)

    I have not the things they wear on the catwalk.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=1, Funny=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 03 2020, @04:40PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 03 2020, @04:40PM (#939126)

    Damn, I had to go back and re-read the GP. I didn't even notice he a word!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 03 2020, @08:20PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 03 2020, @08:20PM (#939209)

      Over my head. I don't get it.
      Anybody?