Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Saturday January 11 2020, @02:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the making-a-point dept.

Vermont bill would ban cell phone use by anyone younger than 21:

A bill has been introduced in Vermont's legislature that would prohibit anyone under 21 years old from using or possessing a cell phone. However, the bill appears to be more about gun rights than cell phones.

The bill, introduced Tuesday by Democratic Sen. John Rodgers, says those under the age of 21 "are not developmentally mature enough" to posses and use cell phones safely. The bill cites fatal car crash and bullying among teens as reasons for the proposed legislation.

"The use of cell phones while driving is one of the leading killers of teenagers in the United States," according to the bill (PDF). "Young people frequently use cell phones to bully and threaten other young people, activities that have been linked to many suicides."

The bill would make possession or use of a cell phone by anyone under 21 punishable by up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

The bill says that if those under 21 "aren't mature enough" to possess guns, smoke cigarettes or drink alcohol, then the same rule should apply to cell phone use. In recent years, the state has passed laws raising the minimum smoking age to 21 and prohibiting the sale of firearms to anyone under 21.

[...] "I have no delusions that it's going to pass. I wouldn't probably vote for it myself," he told the newspaper.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jmichaelhudsondotnet on Saturday January 11 2020, @07:36PM (2 children)

    by jmichaelhudsondotnet (8122) on Saturday January 11 2020, @07:36PM (#942290) Journal

    A phone was at one time a communication device built for this purpose.

    A cell phone was at one time a mobile phone built specifically for this purpose.

    In 2020, a cell phone is a vastly different thing of vastly different complexity so far outside of the typical user's capacity that it boggles the mind.

    https://jmichaelhudson.net/smart-phones-and-wild-bears-2/ [jmichaelhudson.net] (I am looking for someone to seriously consider the equations at thet end, which to my knowledge I am the first to propose)

    It is not a phone, it is a full tower with who knows how many extra sautered-on doodads crammed into a handheld device.

    Better still, it is a black box that does magic for people who could not explain what a transistor is, much less a side-channel attack.

    Also, this is actually kindof sortoff not just an argument against phones, but against a culture based on the automobile.

    It kills so, so many people for such pointless reasons.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 12 2020, @02:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 12 2020, @02:42AM (#942390)

    with who knows how many extra sautered-on doodads

    That's it - the sauter. FFS Hudson, your head is as fat as Hudson Bay, and just as devoid of brain matter.

  • (Score: 2) by EEMac on Sunday January 12 2020, @10:07AM

    by EEMac (6423) on Sunday January 12 2020, @10:07AM (#942472)

    it is a black box that does magic for people who could not explain what a transistor is

    And thank goodness! If I had to explain the transistor-level implementation of every technology before I could use it, I wouldn't get to use very much. Heck, even USB keyboards use microcontrollers I only sort-of know how to program.