SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
This new round of recalls, announced Wednesday, affects US-market vehicles from BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Honda and Subaru, among others. The problem with these already-repaired vehicles is that during the early stages of the recall, Takata replaced dangerous old inflators with new ones of the exact same design and chemistry.
FCA representatives are stating that, while a total of around 50,000 vehicles were affected since the first rounds of this particular recall went out in 2015, there are no new VIN numbers being added to the list. Meanwhile, Honda's representatives say the company's been working on this particular recall since June of 2019, six months before the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration decision.
According to a report Wednesday by Automotive News, Takata believed that since the problem with the inflators was exacerbated by time, temperature and humidity, replacing the inflators with new ones was the best way forward. It wasn't.
Eventually, Takata reformulated the inflator's explosive propellant, adding a drying compound that helps to preserve the unit for much longer. That's what's now being installed in many cars, even though Takata went out of business and was purchased by a Chinese company in 2018. Some companies have opted to go a different way entirely, sourcing airbag inflators from different companies that had nothing to do with Takata.
According to the NHTSA, more than 38 million vehicles have been repaired in the seven years since the recalls started. It also estimates that there were nearly 13 million still-defective parts installed in vehicles as of November 2019.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Sunday January 12 2020, @02:24PM (2 children)
Because in 1990 serious injury and deaths in auto accidents were still mainly attributed to unbelted vehicle occupants.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 2) by PocketSizeSUn on Monday January 13 2020, @09:21AM (1 child)
And the other humorous bit is that an unbelted occupant had a non-zero tendency to be diverted from going out the windshield (survivable) to going out the roof of the vehicle (deadly).
Airbags alone probably come close to being zero benefit with the reduction in injury almost entirely due to the monumental shift in seatbelt use and little to do with airbags themselves.
It's probably not as bad as anti-lock brakes, which are a total negative outcome in terms if accident reduction.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday January 13 2020, @02:11PM
The psychology campaign with mandatory child seats was probably the most effective thing done at the time.
I haven't seen any anti-lock brake negative outcome statistics, but I might liken that to the increased risk of injury when wearing rubber sneakers on wet floors. People who wear relatively slick leather bottom shoes tend to walk more carefully all the time, never depending on "sneaker traction" because it's never there. On the other hand sneakers provide much better traction until they don't, and people actually tend to fall more often and with greater injuries when their sneakers fail to provide them traction on a slick floor.
🌻🌻 [google.com]