Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday January 13 2020, @09:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the black-hole-sun dept.

A stripped helium star solves the massive black hole mystery:

The putative black hole was detected indirectly from the motion of a bright companion star, orbiting an invisible compact object over a period of about 80 days. From new observations, a Belgian team showed that the original measurements were misinterpreted and that the mass of the black hole is, in fact, very uncertain. The most important question, namely how the observed binary system was created, remains unanswered. A crucial aspect is the mass of the visible companion, the hot star LS V+22 25. The more massive this star is, the more massive the black hole has to be to induce the observed motion of the bright star. The latter was considered to be a normal star, eight times more massive than the Sun.

A team of astronomers from Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and the University of Potsdam had a closer look at the archival spectrum of LS V+22 25, taken by the Keck telescope at Mauna Kea, Hawaii. In particular, they were interested in studying the abundances of the chemical elements on the stellar surface. Interestingly, they detected deviations in the abundances of helium, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen compared to the standard composition of a young massive star. The observed pattern on the surface showed ashes resulting from the nuclear fusion of hydrogen, a process that only happens deep in the core of young stars and would not be expected to be detected at its surface.

[...] The authors concluded that LS V+22 25 must have interacted with its compact companion in the past. During this episode of mass-transfer, the outer layers of the star were removed and now the stripped helium core is visible, enriched with the ashes from the burning of hydrogen.

Journal Reference:

A. Irrgang, S. Geier, S. Kreuzer, I. Pelisoli, U. Heber. A stripped helium star in the potential black hole binary LB-1. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2020; 633: L5 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937343


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday January 13 2020, @10:13PM (1 child)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday January 13 2020, @10:13PM (#942878) Journal

    Just publish everything as preprints and let people argue about it in a response paper or on Twitter.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday January 14 2020, @12:47AM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday January 14 2020, @12:47AM (#942924) Homepage
    There is something to be said for the making public of reasearch papers before actual publication, so that responses and rebuttals can be made in a timely manner. Artificially slowing down exchanges of information does not intrinsically improve the quality of the contents of those communications. Kneejerk "yo mamma" posters will be ignored because of the "yo momma", not because of the speed of its delivery.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves