SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Lawrence Lessig sues New York Times over MIT and Jeffrey Epstein interview
Harvard Law professor Lawrence Lessig is suing The New York Times over an interview about the MIT Media Lab accepting money from sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Lessig's defamation suit covers a September 2019 article titled "A Harvard Professor Doubles Down: If You Take Epstein's Money, Do It in Secret." He claims the headline misrepresents his interview, where he condemns the donation, but says that "if you're going to take the money, you damn well better make it anonymous."
Lessig is the founder of Creative Commons and a longtime policy activist; he once ran for president on the promise to pass a single anti-corruption law and then resign. He's also a friend of former MIT Media Lab president Joichi Ito. When Ito admitted last year to secretly receiving around $800,000 from Epstein, Lessig signed a supportive letter and argued that accepting secret donations was better than publicly laundering a criminal's reputation — although he said taking Epstein's money at all was wrong in retrospect.
Times reporter Nellie Bowles interviewed Lessig about the donations and appeared unimpressed by his reasoning. "It is hard to defend soliciting donations from the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. But Lawrence Lessig, a Harvard Law professor, has been trying," she wrote in the article's opening paragraph. Lessig quickly dubbed the piece "clickbait defamation" by the Times. Now, he's turned that accusation into an actual defamation complaint and launched it with a full-fledged multimedia campaign, including a website called "Lessig v. Clickbait Defamation" and a related podcast.
Related:
Lawrence Lessig Considering US Presidential Bid
Wikipedia's Jimbo Wales Joins Lawrence Lessig Presidential Campaign
Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race with his DNA
Richard M. Stallman Resigns
Richard Stallman Deserved to be Fired, Says Fired GNU Hurd Maintainer
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday January 17 2020, @12:50AM (1 child)
And "And you shall take no bribe, for a bribe blinds the clear-sighted and subverts the cause of those who are in the right."
And "The wicked accepts a bribe in secret to pervert the ways of justice."
And "For I know how many are your transgressions and how great are your sins— you who afflict the righteous, who take a bribe, and turn aside the needy in the gate."
There's plenty more along the same lines. Dirty money is dirty money. It corrupts those who take it. Your pastor might want to ask Judas how his taking a bribe to give false testimony worked out. Or just ask him how he would justify taking Nazi gold.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by dwilson on Friday January 17 2020, @03:41AM
He said:
In no way, shape or form is accepting money on those terms a bribe. A bribe is in essence a payment for services rendered. No services rendered, no bribe.
- D