The University of Warwick's Andrew Oswald and his team compared survey data on the life satisfaction of more than 900,000 citizens of 27 European countries from 1980 to 2011 with data on annual advertising spending in those nations over the same period. The researchers found an inverse connection between the two. The higher a country's ad spend was in one year, the less satisfied its citizens were a year or two later. Their conclusion: Advertising makes us unhappy.
Oswald: We did find a significant negative relationship. When you look at changes in national happiness each year and changes in ad spending that year or a few years earlier—and you hold other factors like GDP and unemployment constant—there is a link. This suggests that when advertisers pour money into a country, the result is diminished well-being for the people living there.
HBR: What prompted you to investigate this?
[ . . . ] I can't help noticing the increasing amount of ads we're bombarded with. For me, it was natural to wonder whether it might create dissatisfaction in our culture [ . . . ] In a sense they're trying to generate dissatisfaction—stirring up your desires so that you spend more
[ . . . . ] exposing people to a lot of advertising raises their aspirations—and makes them feel that their own lives, achievements, belongings, and experiences are inadequate.
[ . . . . ] we controlled for lots of other influences on happiness. Second, we looked at increases or drops in advertising in a given year and showed that they successfully predicted a rise or fall in national happiness in ensuing years.
So always take two ad blockers before bedtime.
(Score: 2) by etherscythe on Thursday January 16 2020, @06:57PM
We've heard references to the "war for hearts and minds" going on outside of US borders. What isn't mentioned is that it started inside those borders, with the same tactics and the same false "us vs. them" dichotomy behind it, and with much the same disdainful response on the part of those smart enough to see past the smoke show. Respect is earned, and while they may be commercially successful, ad agencies and their clients are failing to earn it, which is why they have to work so hard. If you need proof, look no further than the disclaimers that these ad networks publish about the malware that gets hosted on their distribution systems.
Ads are micro-aggressions in a war against the whole world, afflicting everyone without an effective blocker strategy. How many people do they kill in combined person-years wasted? I have a TV, but I use it only as a 4k PC monitor and gaming console display; I've long since opted out of the mandatory ad-watching ecosystem. I don't doubt the results of this study for a moment.
"Fake News: anything reported outside of my own personally chosen echo chamber"