Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday January 16 2020, @11:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the ad-viewing-quota-enforcement dept.

Advertising Makes Us Unhappy

The University of Warwick's Andrew Oswald and his team compared survey data on the life satisfaction of more than 900,000 citizens of 27 European countries from 1980 to 2011 with data on annual advertising spending in those nations over the same period. The researchers found an inverse connection between the two. The higher a country's ad spend was in one year, the less satisfied its citizens were a year or two later. Their conclusion: Advertising makes us unhappy.

Oswald: We did find a significant negative relationship. When you look at changes in national happiness each year and changes in ad spending that year or a few years earlier—and you hold other factors like GDP and unemployment constant—there is a link. This suggests that when advertisers pour money into a country, the result is diminished well-being for the people living there.

HBR: What prompted you to investigate this?

[ . . . ] I can't help noticing the increasing amount of ads we're bombarded with. For me, it was natural to wonder whether it might create dissatisfaction in our culture [ . . . ] In a sense they're trying to generate dissatisfaction—stirring up your desires so that you spend more

[ . . . . ] exposing people to a lot of advertising raises their aspirations—and makes them feel that their own lives, achievements, belongings, and experiences are inadequate.

[ . . . . ] we controlled for lots of other influences on happiness. Second, we looked at increases or drops in advertising in a given year and showed that they successfully predicted a rise or fall in national happiness in ensuing years.

So always take two ad blockers before bedtime.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jmichaelhudsondotnet on Friday January 17 2020, @12:19PM

    by jmichaelhudsondotnet (8122) on Friday January 17 2020, @12:19PM (#944506) Journal

    I don't need to look up things that are tatoottooed deep in my brain. :)

    But you are correct to notice I am coming from the same school of thought.

    That website is cancer though, so meta. 'we are the brand genius itself and we give out iq chits like carnival tokens' I have same to say about the 'genius' bar. Every company is always trying, under our current marketing ruled system, to associate every positive word in the english language with their private tyrannical financial entity as a categorical imperative, undercutting all language, nothing is sacred or reserved for actual use by actual people.

    Uniform Degenerating Force

    they have one for me they have one for you

    you might enjoy my semantic oddyssey

    https://jmichaelhudson.net/important-definitions [jmichaelhudson.net]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2