Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday January 17 2020, @11:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the a-slap-on-the-wrist dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

A Georgia court granted final approval for an Equifax settlement in a class-action lawsuit, after the credit-reporting agency was hit by its massive 2017 data breach.

Equifax will pay $380.5 million to settle lawsuits regarding the 2017 data breach, the Atlanta federal judge reportedly ruled this week. In addition, Equifax may be required to dole out an additional $125 million "if needed to satisfy claims for certain out-of-pocket losses."

"We are pleased that the Court approved the settlement, which provides significant benefits for consumers whose information was impacted in the 2017 breach," an Equifax spokesperson told Threatpost.

The $380.5 million will be placed into a fund for consumers affected who are part of the class outlined in the lawsuit. The settlement cost will also cover attorneys' fees, expenses and administration costs.

The $380.5 million for affected consumers is slightly more than the $300 million proposed previously  by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in July 2019. The July 2019 proposal was subject to the federal court's Monday approval.

As part of the settlement, the company will also need to pay at least $1 billion for improved security, as well as $175 million to 48 states in the U.S and and $100 million in civil penalties to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

Equifax will also need to pay $1.4 billion in litigation expenses and $77.5 million as a percentage based fee, according to Bloomberg.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Touché) by Thexalon on Friday January 17 2020, @05:02PM (2 children)

    by Thexalon (636) on Friday January 17 2020, @05:02PM (#944594)

    So if I'm reading this correctly, the lawyers are getting approximately 4-5 times what the affected people are getting.

    And yeah, the fact that Equifax is still in business is a problem, because from now on investors will have a price to compare to when failing to push for business's records to be properly secured.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Touché=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by darkfeline on Saturday January 18 2020, @03:17AM (1 child)

    by darkfeline (1030) on Saturday January 18 2020, @03:17AM (#944854) Homepage

    Or more to the point, that $1.4 billion in litigation expenses isn't a fine. It's a tax write-off.

    --
    Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
    • (Score: 2) by Common Joe on Saturday January 18 2020, @09:54AM

      by Common Joe (33) <common.joe.0101NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Saturday January 18 2020, @09:54AM (#944936) Journal

      I was marveling at the fact that "The $380.5 million for affected consumers is slightly more than the $300 million proposed previously..." means $80.5 million is chump change. Side note: if anyone has a little extra in their pocket and is willing to throw a couple of mill my way, I'd be happy to accept.