Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday January 18 2020, @05:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-are-here dept.

CNet:

The first aren't even built yet, but [Elon Musk] already has big plans for his company's spacecraft, which includes turning humans into an interplanetary species with a presence on Mars. He crunched some of the numbers he has in mind on Twitter on Thursday.

Musk doesn't just want to launch a few intrepid souls to Mars, he wants to send a whole new nation. He tossed out a goal of building 100 Starships per year to send about 100,000 people from Earth to Mars every time the planets' orbits line up favorably.

A Twitter user ran the figures and checked if Musk planned to land a million humans on Mars by 2050. "Yes," . The SpaceX CEO has suggested this sort of . This new round of tweets give us some more insight into how it could be done, though "ambitious" doesn't do that timeline justice. Miraculous might be a more fitting description.
...
fans, rejoice. there will be plenty of jobs on Mars. When asked how people would be selected for the Red Planet move, , "Needs to be such that anyone can go if they want, with loans available for those who don't have money." So perhaps you could pay off your SpaceX loans with a sweet terraforming gig.

Terraforming the planet should be easy if Quaid can get past Cohagen and start the reactor.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 19 2020, @02:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 19 2020, @02:56PM (#945298)

    Understanding "Why?" should drive the choice of many folks to send first.

    There's a list above that may miss the point of why?
      (Primary reasons overpopulation underemployment, etc)

    I think the starting point is that humans learn a lot like other animals by trying random stuff and occasionally getting lucky.
    It's probably in our genes, perhaps from hunter/gather?
    Sometimes we can think thru a situation and find a solution, but for really new stuff dumb luck seems a primary algorithm.
    That makes exploration a key driver. We want to go to new places because we are driven to go learn something useful.
    There are examples where this drive can be stronger than hunger.

    I think the top reasons for doing this are more like:
    1) Exploration - to see what's there
    2) Challenge - because we can
    3) Exploitation - we found something there we need here
    4) Colonization - we want a new place to call our own

    Given the history of space exploration, it would be hard to say that there is not a bit of this well
    0) Sell the dream - because we can make profit here by getting folks to dream of going there

    Historically, a nation state has been able to get to step 3, but to get to deeply into step 3 and to 4 requires crowdsourcing.
    That required some sort of individual incentive more than exploration or challenge.
    I don't see this in the talk of 100k?