Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday January 20 2020, @12:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the whoop-de-doo? dept.

Whooping cough evolving into a superbug:

Australia needs a new whooping cough vaccine to ensure our most vulnerable are protected from the emergence of superbug strains, new UNSW research has shown.

The current vaccine, widely used since 2000, targets three antigens in the bacteria of the highly contagious respiratory disease which can be fatal to infants.

All babies under six months old -- in particular, newborns not protected by maternal immunisation -- are at risk of catching the vaccine-preventable disease because they are either too young to be vaccinated or have not yet completed the three-dose primary vaccine course.

Australia's whooping cough epidemic from 2008 to 2012 saw more than 140,000 cases -- with a peak of almost 40,000 in 2011 -- and revealed the rise of evolving strains able to evade vaccine-generated immunity.

In a series of UNSW studies, with the latest published today in Vaccine, UNSW researchers took this knowledge further and showed, in a world-first discovery, that the evolving strains made additional changes to better survive in their host, regardless of that person's vaccination status. They also identified new antigens as potential vaccine targets.

First author and microbiologist Dr Laurence Luu, who led the team of researchers with Professor Ruiting Lan, said whooping cough's ability to adapt to vaccines and survival in humans might be the answer to its surprise resurgence despite Australia's high vaccination rates.

"We found the whooping cough strains were evolving to improve their survival, regardless of whether a person was vaccinated or not, by producing more nutrient-binding and transport proteins, and fewer immunogenic proteins which are not targeted by the vaccine," Dr Luu said.

[...] "Put simply, the bacteria that cause whooping cough are becoming better at hiding and better at feeding -- they're morphing into a superbug."

Dr Luu said it was therefore possible for a vaccinated person to contract whooping cough bacteria without symptoms materialising.

Journal Reference:
Laurence Don Wai Luu, Sophie Octavia, Chelsea Aitken, Ling Zhong, Mark J. Raftery, Vitali Sintchenko, Ruiting Lan. Surfaceome analysis of Australian epidemic Bordetella pertussis reveals potential vaccine antigens. Vaccine, 2020; 38 (3): 539 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.062


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 20 2020, @12:39PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 20 2020, @12:39PM (#945766)

    Vaccine-induced antibodies targeting a specific microbial protein. Mass-produced antibiotics targeting a specific microbial protein. No fundamental difference.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by c0lo on Monday January 20 2020, @01:14PM (2 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 20 2020, @01:14PM (#945783) Journal

    Mass-produced antibiotics targeting a specific microbial protein.

    Except this one is a non-sense, likely invented to show the "non-difference" trait.
    Here [sigmaaldrich.com]:

    • Inhibits an Enzyme - (111)
    • Interferes with Cell Membrane Permeability (Ionophores) - (67)
    • Interferes with Cell Wall Synthesis - (73)
    • Interferes with DNA Synthesis - (106)
    • Interferes with Protein Synthesis - (130)

    The closest your non-sense can classify into is the last one. If you read it, you'll see the antibiotics acting on this path interfere with the synthesis of proteins in general, not a single specific target protein.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 21 2020, @07:13AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 21 2020, @07:13AM (#946207)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibody [wikipedia.org]
      Do read it and learn a bit. If you're capable of learning, that is, oh cretinous one.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 21 2020, @07:26AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 21 2020, @07:26AM (#946213)

      This is a postscriptum: next time, please refrain from brandishing links where you understand precisely nothing of. Because, oh stupid one, when you do, you firmly put both your feet into your eating orifice.

      Inhibits an Enzyme - (111)
              Interferes with Cell Membrane Permeability (Ionophores) - (85)
              Interferes with Cell Wall Synthesis - (72)
              Interferes with DNA Synthesis - (103)
              Interferes with Protein Synthesis - (129)

      So you quoted something that's Greek to you. And then:

      The closest your non-sense can classify into is the last one.

      Open mouth, insert both feet.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enzyme [wikipedia.org] : "Enzymes /ˈɛnzaɪmz/ are both proteins and biological catalysts (biocatalysts)."
      Proteins, oh loudmouth.
      The same as are those unknown-to-you things doing membrane permeability and cell wall and DNA synthesis.

      From now on, on the matters of biology, be silent. You have no knowledge of it.