Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday January 20 2020, @09:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the big-kaboom dept.

SpaceX completed the last big test of its crew capsule before launching astronauts in the next few months, mimicking an emergency escape shortly after liftoff Sunday.

No one was aboard for the wild ride in the skies above Cape Canaveral, just two mannequins.

A Falcon 9 rocket blasted off as normal, but just over a minute into its capsule catapulted off the top 12 miles (20 kilometers) above the Atlantic. Powerful thrusters on the capsule propelled it up and out of harm's way, as the rocket engines deliberately shut down and the booster tumbled out of control and exploded in a giant fireball.

The capsule reached an altitude of about 27 miles (44 kilometers) before parachuting into the ocean just offshore to bring the nine-minute test flight to a close and pave the way for two NASA astronauts to climb aboard next time.

Everything appeared to go well despite the choppy seas and overcast skies. Within minutes, a recovery ship was alongside the capsule and preparing to pull it from the water.

"I'm super fired up," Elon Musk, the company's founder and chief executive, said at a news conference. "It's just going to be wonderful to get astronauts back into orbit from American soil after almost a decade of not being able to do so. That's just super exciting."

NASA astronauts have not launched from the U.S. since 2011 when the space shuttle program ended.

[...] Last month, meanwhile, Boeing's Starliner crew capsule ended up in the wrong orbit on its first test flight and had to skip the space station. The previous month, only two of the Starliner's three parachutes deployed during a launch abort test.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday January 21 2020, @01:01AM (3 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday January 21 2020, @01:01AM (#946099) Journal

    But, but, but, isn't that even worser than having CO2 in the air? Lemme think about this . . . shouldn't there be a law against the destruction of matter?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 21 2020, @01:39PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 21 2020, @01:39PM (#946326)

    There was until that Einstein guy said the answer was E=mc2 instead.

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday January 21 2020, @03:02PM (1 child)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday January 21 2020, @03:02PM (#946354) Journal

      But, that other guy said the answer is 42. This gets so confusing . . . if E=mc2, and E=42, then mc2 has to equal 42?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 25 2020, @11:25PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 25 2020, @11:25PM (#948643)

        If mc2 = 42 then obviously mc = 4
        m= 2
        c = 2
        It's all so simple. Everthing is 2.