Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday January 24 2020, @07:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the Surprise! dept.

CenturyLink, Frontier Took FCC Cash, Failed to Deploy All Required Broadband:

CenturyLink and Frontier Communications have apparently failed to meet broadband-deployment requirements in numerous states where they are receiving government funding to expand their networks in rural areas.

[...]Under program rules, the ISPs were required to bring Internet access to 80 percent of funded locations by the end of 2019 and must hit 100 percent by the end of 2020. While CenturyLink and Frontier apparently failed to hit the 80 percent requirement in a bunch of states, they could meet the final goal in time if they ramp up construction.

[...]The Connect America Fund, like the FCC's other universal-service programs, is paid for by Americans through fees on their phone bills.

As we wrote Monday, Frontier is reportedly planning to file for bankruptcy within two months.

[...]After reviewing and validating the data, Frontier and CenturyLink are scheduled to provide the FCC with final numbers by March 1.

Both Frontier and CenturyLink have histories of mistreating customers. Frontier's frequent outages and long repair times triggered an investigation and settlement in Minnesota, and New York state officials are also investigating Frontier.

[...]In December, CenturyLink agreed to pay a $6.1 million penalty after Washington state regulators found that the company failed to disclose fees that raised actual prices well above advertised rates. CenturyLink was also forced to stop charging an "Internet Cost Recovery Fee" in the state. The company still faces a class-action lawsuit involving customers from multiple states alleging billing fraud.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Friday January 24 2020, @02:47PM (5 children)

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Friday January 24 2020, @02:47PM (#947944)

    The got rid of debtor's prisons for a reason. Are you proposing bringing them back?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Snotnose on Friday January 24 2020, @03:28PM (4 children)

    by Snotnose (1623) on Friday January 24 2020, @03:28PM (#947965)

    ??? They took money promising to do something with it. They didn't do it. They should either give the money back or go to jail. How is that bringing back debtors prison?

    --
    Why shouldn't we judge a book by it's cover? It's got the author, title, and a summary of what the book's about.
    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Taxi Dudinous on Friday January 24 2020, @03:38PM

      by Taxi Dudinous (8690) on Friday January 24 2020, @03:38PM (#947972)

      Based on my experience, this is their standard business model.

    • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Friday January 24 2020, @03:58PM (1 child)

      by PiMuNu (3823) on Friday January 24 2020, @03:58PM (#947979)

      > They should either give the money back or go to jail.

      Bankruptcy is the legal instrument whereby a person or organisation can renege on their financial obligations (for example, obligation to complete a contract).

      I believe you are proposing an alternative, whereby a person is jailed should they be unable to execute their financial obligations, or (in this case) the obligations of the company over which they have responsibility.

      It's okay, but I would like to be clear on the detail of your proposition. Is the idea to jail only (former) company directors? Or those whose salary used to be above a certain margin?

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Joe Desertrat on Sunday January 26 2020, @11:23PM

        by Joe Desertrat (2454) on Sunday January 26 2020, @11:23PM (#949049)

        This is where corporate law is in serious need of reform. Currently it appears that the major players in a corporation can pocket the money and leave the corporation in distress, with no recourse for creditors or those that eventually have to foot the bill to clean up the mess.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by toddestan on Saturday January 25 2020, @12:20AM

      by toddestan (4982) on Saturday January 25 2020, @12:20AM (#948258)

      Personally, I don't they they should be able to get off scott-free by just returning the money as they still reneged on their promises. At the very least there should also be fines, if not some jail time for attempting to defraud those they took the money from.

      Though if they do actually have valid reasons for not being able to get it done I'd cut them some slack.