Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday January 27 2020, @12:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the but-how-do-they-taste? dept.

3D Glasses Work On Cuttlefish And It's Adorable:

Every so often, scientists grace the undeserving public with an experiment seemingly designed solely to make us giggle in delight. Without any further ado, Cuttlefish Wearing 3D Glasses: [YouTube Link]

[...] Initial attempts to glue the glasses straight on the cuttlefish (yikes!) led to skin damage, and the scientists solved this by instead gluing little velcro strips (double yikes!) to both their heads and the glasses, so that they could strap them on.

Cuttlefish love to snack on shrimp, and the way they catch them is by swimming forward and backward to adjust for distance, then launching their tentacles at prey from just the right spot. Scientists weren't sure if the cuttlefish would do this for the 3D animated shrimp in their little movie, but they totally did. [...] The cuttlefish adjusted their distance, they launched their tentacles, and even though they came up empty-handed, they proved that scientists were at least on the right track.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Monday January 27 2020, @01:19PM (4 children)

    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Monday January 27 2020, @01:19PM (#949295) Journal
    Why not just test the behaviour against that of one-eyed cuttlefish? After all, humans and other animals have more than one way to experience depth perception.
    --
    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by ikanreed on Monday January 27 2020, @03:24PM (1 child)

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 27 2020, @03:24PM (#949351) Journal

    They wanted to prove that adjusting vision would adjust reach distance. A numeric relationship of a dependent variable to a controlled independent variable is more evidence for a hypothesis than subjectively described behavior.

    • (Score: 1, Redundant) by barbara hudson on Monday January 27 2020, @05:39PM

      by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Monday January 27 2020, @05:39PM (#949420) Journal
      Except it is easier/less cruel to just cover one eye with a patch. You'd get the same information without crazy gluing crap to both eyes.
      --
      SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
  • (Score: 2) by pvanhoof on Monday January 27 2020, @11:25PM (1 child)

    by pvanhoof (4638) on Monday January 27 2020, @11:25PM (#949655) Homepage

    Animal cruelty? Why would you blind a Cuttlefish if you can just strap 3D glasses in front of both its eyes?

    • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Monday January 27 2020, @11:32PM

      by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Monday January 27 2020, @11:32PM (#949658) Journal
      A temporary patch over one eye is a lot less intrusive than crazy-gluing stuff to them. Also, it's not like there are some animals that are already missing an eye. This was needless cruelty for what? Stupid and cruel.
      --
      SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.