Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
Political polarization among Americans has grown rapidly in the last 40 years—more than in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia or Germany—a phenomenon possibly due to increased racial division, the rise of partisan cable news and changes in the composition of the Democratic and Republican parties.
That's according to new research co-authored by Jesse Shapiro, a professor of political economy at Brown University. The study, conducted alongside Stanford University economists Levi Boxell and Matthew Gentzkow, was released on Monday, Jan. 20, as a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.
In the study, Shapiro and colleagues present the first ever multi-nation evidence on long-term trends in "affective polarization"—a phenomenon in which citizens feel more negatively toward other political parties than toward their own. They found that in the U.S., affective polarization has increased more dramatically since the late 1970s than in the eight other countries they examined—the U.K., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Switzerland, Norway and Sweden.
"A lot of analysis on polarization is focused on the U.S., so we thought it could be interesting to put the U.S. in context and see whether it is part of a global trend or whether it looks more exceptional," Shapiro said. "We found that the trend in the U.S. is indeed exceptional."
Using data from four decades of public opinion surveys conducted in the nine countries, the researchers used a so-called "feeling thermometer" to rate attitudes on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 reflected no negative feelings toward other parties. They found that in 1978, the average American rated the members of their own political party 27 points higher than members of the other major party. By 2016, Americans were rating their own party 45.9 points higher than the other party, on average. In other words, negative feelings toward members of the other party compared to one's own party increased by an average of 4.8 points per decade.
The researchers found that polarization had also risen in Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland in the last 40 years, but to a lesser extent. In the U.K., Australia, Germany, Norway and Sweden, polarization decreased.
More information: Levi Boxell et al, Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization, (2020). DOI: 10.3386/w26669
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Gaaark on Monday January 27 2020, @08:13PM (2 children)
Yup: a college degree in being a YES MAN (which I see too often) does not make an educated person.
If you can't think AND change your thinking WHEN (not if) you are wrong, you are useless.
You CAN'T lead when your lips are attached to an asshole.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 3, Insightful) by c0lo on Tuesday January 28 2020, @12:00AM (1 child)
But one can pose as a leader, by the metric of how many others are attaching (willingly or not) their lips to one's ass (incidentally, this is the vision of career bureaucrats).
For (far too) many, posing is just enough - don't tell me this surprises you.
(note: bureaucracy is not inherent to public institutions. One will find such persons inside the mid-management in companies, usually those that will show you an MBA paper)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 28 2020, @03:09AM
How so very true. The most memorable illustration of this was an interesting text called: "The Peter Principle" [1] I encountered in my youth.
I thought it '+1 Insightful" then, and still do many decades later. :-)
*note: I find the parallel between 'The Peter Principle" and 'Idiocracy' disturbing: both intended as satires, that became somewhat seemingly predictive.
{1}https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle/ [wikipedia.org]