Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday January 28 2020, @06:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the see-thru-glasses dept.

Researchers hope to make needle pricks for diabetics a thing of the past:

Patients with diabetes have to test their blood sugar levels several times a day to make sure they are not getting too high or too low. Studies have shown that more than half of patients don't test often enough, in part because of the pain and inconvenience of the needle prick.

One possible alternative is Raman spectroscopy, a noninvasive technique that reveals the chemical composition of tissue, such as skin, by shining near-infrared light on it. MIT scientists have now taken an important step toward making this technique practical for patient use: They have shown that they can use it to directly measure glucose concentrations through the skin. Until now, glucose levels had to be calculated indirectly, based on a comparison between Raman signals and a reference measurement of blood glucose levels.

While more work is needed to develop the technology into a user-friendly device, this advance shows that a Raman-based sensor for continuous glucose monitoring could be feasible, says Peter So, a professor of biological and mechanical engineering at MIT.

"Today, diabetes is a global epidemic," says So, who is one of the senior authors of the study and the director of MIT's Laser Biomedical Research Center. "If there were a good method for continuous glucose monitoring, one could potentially think about developing better management of the disease."

Sung Hyun Nam of the Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology in Seoul is also a senior author of the study, which appears today in Science Advances. Jeon Woong Kang, a research scientist at MIT, and Yun Sang Park, a research staff member at Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, are the lead authors of the paper.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday January 28 2020, @07:57PM (1 child)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday January 28 2020, @07:57PM (#950199) Journal

    I think FreeStyle is a brand of glucometer. Another brand is OneTouch (or sometimes: "OneOuch" without the T)

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Tuesday January 28 2020, @09:42PM

    by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Tuesday January 28 2020, @09:42PM (#950252) Journal

    It is. And Coutour/Contour Next, One Touch, Care Touch, Accu-Check (used long enough in hospitals that "Accu-Check" is usually hospital shorthand for taking a fingerstick serum glucose...), ReliOn (WalMart inhouse brand), and a whole lot of others. They all suffer accuracy problems slightly (within 10%-20% IIRC, and usually it's a consistent error margin) but is close enough to confirm hypo or hyperglycemia with added symptomology for a home user and sufficient enough for insulin delivery once you get used to your meter. Hospitals typically have to use calibrated devices which have a little greater precision than that, but a level a home user doesn't have to worry about.

    --
    This sig for rent.