Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday January 30 2020, @11:23AM   Printer-friendly

As a followup to an earlier blog post at Ubuntu's blog about why those on Windows 7 should upgrade to Ubuntu, the same blog has a post about how to actually do it.

A few days ago, Rhys Davies wrote a timely article, titled Why you should upgrade to Ubuntu. In it, he outlined a high-level overview of what the end of support of Windows 7 signifies for the typical user, the consideration – and advantages – of migrating to Ubuntu as an alternative, and the basic steps one should undertake to achieve this.

We'd like to expand on this idea. We will provide a series of detailed, step-by-step tutorials that should help less tech-savvy Windows 7 users migrate from their old operating system to Ubuntu. We will start with considerations for the move, with emphasis on applications and data backup. Then, we will follow up with the installation of the new operating system, and finally cover the Ubuntu desktop tour, post-install configuration and setup.

The upcoming Long Term Support (LTS) release will have not just the usual five years of regular support but an optional additional five years for those that decide to pay. That would be 10 years starting from April, 2020.

Previously:
Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on a Dell XPS 13 (2018)
How to Create a Custom Ubuntu ISO with Cubic (2018)
Debian vs. Ubuntu: What's the Difference? (2017)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday January 31 2020, @11:02PM (1 child)

    by Bot (3902) on Friday January 31 2020, @11:02PM (#952031) Journal

    Proprietary software does not compete with free software.

    The aims are different.

    Proprietary software is about keeping the user tied up. Free software is about some other things, scratching itches, giving away, building on a base that you are unable to replicate, believing in freedom.

    Proprietary software isn't providing a superior alternative, if they did they would not need to actively boycott free software.

    Proprietary software has to change and be incompatible, users sniff that out after a while.

    As long as they keep the games, proprietary software is safe. There you have actual competition and an actual advantage for who has more resources. Same for some ever shrinking vertical markets. But for the bulk of users and business Free software is perfectly viable. It is difficult to find people who will let you free without using free software as an excuse to tie you up in their ecosystem, that's all.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Friday January 31 2020, @11:33PM

    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Friday January 31 2020, @11:33PM (#952051) Journal
    Proprietary software doesn't boycott free software. It's the free software that imposes restrictive licensing requirements so that non-free software can't use it. Except for BSD-licensed software the ONLY free software license. The gpl is far from free in comparison because of the restrictions it imposes.

    Linux on the desktop? Nope. But a real Unix - FreeBSD - has been the underpinning of OSX for years. That could have been Linux except for the GPL.

    --
    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.