Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday January 31 2020, @11:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the Brexit-Means-Brexit dept.

UK set for Brexit, as PM promises 'new dawn'

The UK [officially left] the European Union at 23:00 GMT, ending 47 years of membership.

[...] Pro and anti-Brexit demonstrations and marches are being held across the country, as the UK flag is taken down from EU institutions in Brussels.

Little will change immediately, as the UK begins a "transition period".

Most EU laws will continue to be in force - including the free movement of people - until the end of December, by which time the UK aims to have reached a permanent free trade agreement with the EU.

[...] The prime minister held a cabinet meeting at the National Glass Centre, a museum and arts centre in Sunderland, the city that was the first to back Brexit when results were announced after the referendum.

The meeting was held amid tight security.

[...] Mr Johnson told the Cabinet it was time to start a "new chapter in the United Kingdom's story" and end the division of the past three and a half years, according to a Downing Street spokesman.

The Cabinet discussed future trade deals, including seeking a a Canada-style free trade agreement with the EU, and Mr Johnson thanked Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay for the work of his department, which is being wound up.

The PM told ministers the government aimed to have 80% of the UK's trade with other nations covered by free trade agreements within three years.

[...] "This is the moment when the dawn breaks and the curtain goes up on a new act. It is a moment of real national renewal and change."

[...] A new commemorative 50p coin will also come into circulation to mark the UK's withdrawal.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Touché) by ikanreed on Saturday February 01 2020, @01:16AM (8 children)

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Saturday February 01 2020, @01:16AM (#952103) Journal

    Things that don't bother the queen:
    *Brexit
    *Her pedo son
    *The legality of actions taken by prime ministers

    Things that do bother the queen:
    *A princling stepping down from the royal family in a way that gives even the slightest hint that royalty isn't an innate feature of the universe

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Touché=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by MostCynical on Saturday February 01 2020, @03:02AM (3 children)

    by MostCynical (2589) on Saturday February 01 2020, @03:02AM (#952147) Journal

    Wanting and abusing power is fine. (Phillip, Andrew, Charles, etc..)
    After all, they have a God-given right to rule.

    not wanting power confuses and confounds. (Harry)

    Also, I like to imagine this conversation:
    "Look, here's the DNA test results. You're not my grandmother, I'm not fifth in line to the throne, so I'm taking my wife and leaving"

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Grishnakh on Saturday February 01 2020, @04:16AM (2 children)

      by Grishnakh (2831) on Saturday February 01 2020, @04:16AM (#952179)

      The problem with all of this is that Harry isn't just taking his wife and leaving, he's taking a bunch of money. He has a lot of wealth and privilege because of his royal status, and of course they aren't giving that all up to live as regular people. It's kinda like Superman in Superman II: he couldn't live like a human and marry Lois without giving up his powers. Harry and his wife seem to want to keep the money and privilege, but not the responsibilities that come with royalty.

      • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 01 2020, @03:47PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 01 2020, @03:47PM (#952358)

        Wait... are you telling me they didn't earn all those medals and awards the hard way?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 02 2020, @03:55AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 02 2020, @03:55AM (#952629)

        Meghan got her trophy husband and now can go back to acting. With her increased profile, anything house husband Harry supposedly owes the Commonwealth taxpayer is equivalent to the paycheck of her next movie.

        Tl;dr who cares?

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by fustakrakich on Saturday February 01 2020, @03:16AM

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday February 01 2020, @03:16AM (#952154) Journal

    British royalty is a perfectly cromulent tourist attraction. Can you imagine if Mickey and Minnie left Disneyland for Knott's Berry Farm?

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 01 2020, @11:49AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 01 2020, @11:49AM (#952297)

    The little ginger Nazi "grandson" that probably isn't even her biological grandson is more important then most things or not. I guess she knows not to touch the whole Diana-issue so they all just keep pretending that Harry comes from Charles.

  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by theluggage on Saturday February 01 2020, @11:55AM (1 child)

    by theluggage (1797) on Saturday February 01 2020, @11:55AM (#952299)

    *Brexit

    *The legality of actions taken by prime ministers

    To be fair, the constitution prohibits her from being bothered by those things. TL:DNR: The UK monarch is allowed to stay on the throne on the strict condition that they don't try to rule and just slap the Royal seal wherever the elected PM tells them to.

    Personally, I'd tell the lot of them to become self-funding - if they're such a boon to tourism maybe they should seek direct sponsorship from the tourist industry. Private sector royalty (e.g. the house of Kardashian, Queen Oprah and the First Lords of The Major League) seems to work well in the USA (although they haven't got the message about banning them from government).

    Still, I'm not sure it's a priority, and the royals probably do more good work that the typical idle rich. Even comrade Corbyn didn't include abolishing the monarchy on the second longest suicide note in history.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 01 2020, @03:51PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 01 2020, @03:51PM (#952360)

      The parts that are "self-funding" are the parts they keep for themselves - rents, land ownership. Don't you know Prince Charles earned $40m-odd this year? What a busy beaver! The rest is what we the people get to keep - maintaining the palace(s), grounds(s), yacht(s), hosting banquet(s).