Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Grubhub is Faking Which Restaurants It Actually Partners With

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday February 02 2020, @07:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the follow-the-money dept.

upstart from IRC writes:

Grubhub is faking which restaurants it actually partners with:

Grubhub has a new "growth hacking" strategy that includes creating a restaurant listing on its platform for places it doesn't even partner with. According to a new report by the San Francisco Chronicle and tweets by restaurant owner Pim Techamuanvivit, Grubhub has been allowing customers to order food from its websites from restaurants that haven't technically signed up to be on Grubhub or its subsidiaries' platforms. (Disclosure: my parents own a restaurant that partners with Grubhub.)

Techamuanvivit explains in a Twitter thread that over the weekend, she received a call from a customer claiming their order hadn't been delivered. The only problem: Techamuanvivit's restaurant, Kin Khao, doesn't offer takeout or delivery.

I told him we've never been on it, not in our entirely lifetime as @kinkhao. He sounded really confused, so we said goodbye and I hung up the phone. Then I got a little curious, so I went into the office and googled "kin khao delivery", and guess what came up.. pic.twitter.com/cptMoYtoZu

— Pim Techamuanvivit (@chezpim) January 26, 2020

Previously:
Grubhub's New Strategy Is to Be an Even Worse Partner to Restaurants
Grubhub Says its Contract Allowed It to Create Fake Restaurant Websites
Grubhub Drivers Are Contractors—Not Employees—Judge Rules
Trial to Decide Whether Ex-Grubhub Driver Should be Classified as Employee

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Grubhub is Faking Which Restaurants It Actually Partners With | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 32 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 02 2020, @08:50PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 02 2020, @08:50PM (#952843)

    In addition to possible criminal fraud charges, Grubhub is pretty clearly engaging in "Tortious interference with business relationships"; in this case, preventing a customer and the restaurant from engaging in economic activity with each other. The restaurant can, and should, sue Grubhub out of existence.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=3, Total=4
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   4  

  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 02 2020, @08:59PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 02 2020, @08:59PM (#952848)

    Thank you been racking my brain for the past half hour trying to think of the legal term!

    Out of existence, probably not. Settlement I could see. The VC guys will want that to 'go away' and will pay for it. It is why you see so much 'woke' crap these days. No one wants to be sued.