Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday February 03 2020, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the follow-the-money dept.

Ajit Pai promised faster broadband expansion:

2019 was the second straight year that Comcast lowered its overall cable capital expenditures (though Comcast's spending on line extensions and scalable infrastructure rose in 2018).

This wasn't supposed to happen, according to claims that ISPs and Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai made in order to push through the repeal of net neutrality rules and other deregulatory measures. Pai, who just today released an 11-page list of his accomplishments as FCC chair, repeatedly argued that net neutrality rules caused broadband providers to reduce capital expenditures. After his net neutrality repeal took effect in June 2018, he claimed that the repeal and other FCC deregulation caused investment to rise.

But Comcast isn't the only major ISP cutting investment, as AT&T projects that it will reduce capital spending from $23 billion in 2019 to $20 billion in 2020. Charter Communications said in October that its capital expenditures excluding mobile services would total $7 billion in 2019, down from $8.9 billion in 2018. Verizon reported a small increase in capital expenditures in the first nine months of 2019.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bussdriver on Monday February 03 2020, @06:16PM (4 children)

    by bussdriver (6876) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 03 2020, @06:16PM (#953216)

    They need to be entrenched securely before they start fucking you because you'll rise up and make popular things like net neutrality into LAW. It undermines their enemies if they don't jump instantly into raping their customers.

    You already must have data caps with fines for going over? I didn't get those until Trump took over; now I have to pay if I go over my cap-- naturally they don't present it as a fine... but that is that it is; they also don't advertise unlimited anymore. The other company they now somewhat have to compete with is the phone company here which is actually worse to deal with and has gotten in trouble for "accidentally" billing people... just not as much as comcast who did the same thing. I've gotten money back twice now after they both screwed me over. I'm just going with the lesser of the two.

    Make sure you call their tech support lines for at least 20 minutes two times per year during work hours (so you get Americans) because that eats up their whole profit from you for the year (that is old info but an employee told me that years ago.) Yes, if we all did, it would raise prices... but that won't happen so you can rob them of their profit on you.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 03 2020, @06:55PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 03 2020, @06:55PM (#953239)

    You already must have data caps with fines for going over? I didn't get those until Trump took over;

    Trump didn't invent data caps and neither did the repeal of net neutrality. Charter started imposing data caps in 2010, and lifted them in 2016, which is basically the opposite of the relationship you're trying to illustrate.

    Orange man bad, though.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 03 2020, @10:29PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 03 2020, @10:29PM (#953325)

      Orange man installed corrupt Pai, telecoms then realized they were safe from reprisal and started doing the nasty with their spreadsheets. We already have plans that include #OUR_SPECIAL_SERVICE_NO_DATA_LIMIT#

      I doubt Trump could coherently speak on the topic without a prepared speech so I don't blame him for personally doing these things, but he is the one who controls who is appointed where and I recall him saying something about draining the swamp? Instead he is filling it with piranhas, alligators, and I hear his good friend Escobar donated a hippo.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 03 2020, @11:21PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 03 2020, @11:21PM (#953335)

        Again, telecoms were being nasty before, after and during "net neutrality". OP specifically said:

        You already must have data caps with fines for going over? I didn't get those until Trump took over;

        A quick Google search will tell you, yes, data caps existed before Trump took over. I'm not going to argue Trump has done anything good for things, but you're a blind fool if you think this starts and ends with him, or that "net neutrality" ever had the teeth to reel in this sort of misbehavior to begin with.

        • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 04 2020, @02:08AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 04 2020, @02:08AM (#953373)

          you're a blind fool if you think this starts and ends with him

          I do not, but he certainly made things worse installing that turd Pai, along with tearing down the last shred of pretense behind corruption. The upside is this has let citizens see the total corruption, but the downside is it ramped up the corruption 10x.