Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday February 11 2020, @06:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the Geraldine-says-"The-Devil-made-me-do-it!" dept.

Breathing may change your mind about free will: Do you think that you are clicking on that button when your mind decides to do so? Think again:

Scientists at EPFL[*] in Switzerland have shown that you are more likely to initiate a voluntary decision as you exhale. Published in today's issue of Nature Communications, these findings propose a new angle on an almost 60-year-old neuroscientific debate about free will and the involvement of the human brain.

"We show that voluntary action is indeed linked to your body's inner state, especially with breathing and expiration but not with some other bodily signals, such as the heartbeat," explains Olaf Blanke, EPFL's Foundation Bertarelli Chair in Cognitive Neuroprosthetics and senior author.

At the center of these results is the readiness potential (RP), a signal of brain activity observed in the human cortex that appears not only before voluntary muscle movement, but also before one becomes aware of the intention to move. The RP is the signature of voluntary action since it consistently appears in brain activity measurements right before acts of free will (like being aware that one wants to reach for the chocolate).

[...] These findings suggest that the breathing pattern may be used to predict 'when' people begin voluntary action. Your breathing patterns could also be used to predict consumer behavior, like when you click on that button. Medical devices that use brain-computer interfaces could be tuned and improved according to breathing. The breathing-action coupling could be used in research and diagnostic tools for patients with deficits in voluntary action control, like obsessive compulsive disorders, Parkinson disease, and Tourette syndromes. Blanke and Hyeong-Dong Park, first author of this research, have filed a patent based on these findings.

[...] More generally, the EPFL findings suggest that acts of free will are affected by signals from other systems of the body. Succumbing to that urge to eat chocolate may depend more on your body's internal signals than you may realize!

Blanke elaborates, "That voluntary action, an internally or self-generated action, is coupled with an interoceptive signal, breathing, may be just one example of how acts of free will are hostage to a host of inner body states and the brain's processing of these internal signals. Interestingly, such signals have also been shown to be of relevance for self-consciousness."

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdf6srnVcM0

[*] EPFL: École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne"

Journal Reference:
Hyeong-Dong Park, Coline Barnoud, Henri Trang, Oliver A. Kannape, Karl Schaller, Olaf Blanke. Breathing is coupled with voluntary action and the cortical readiness potential. Nature Communications, 2020; 11 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13967-9


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by acid andy on Tuesday February 11 2020, @03:44PM (2 children)

    by acid andy (1683) on Tuesday February 11 2020, @03:44PM (#956868) Homepage Journal

    That discussion only belongs at the metaphysical boundary between physics and philosophy, nowhere higher.

    I don't have any particular objections to that statement immediately coming to mind. I also don't think the statement is saying very much unless you can clearly define exactly where that metaphysical boundary falls. For example we can probably agree that the boundary will not surround only present-day physics. I'd suggest it surrounds all verifiable physics that could potentially be formed in the future as well.

    --
    If a cat has kittens, does a rat have rittens, a bat bittens and a mat mittens?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday February 14 2020, @10:23AM (1 child)

    by Bot (3902) on Friday February 14 2020, @10:23AM (#958136) Journal

    Physics is about the how. Any "why" answered by physics that can't be more correctly reformulated into "how" is either an assumption or philosophy. The rest is domain of philosophical masturbation, like this one.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    • (Score: 2) by acid andy on Saturday February 15 2020, @01:49AM

      by acid andy (1683) on Saturday February 15 2020, @01:49AM (#958384) Homepage Journal

      Pretty much. The trouble is, it's hard to tell in advance whether or not some problems can be so reformulated to be answerable by physics.

      I think "how" and "why" are both important questions that relate to causal chains. The "how" questions seek a more detailed breakdown of the current link in the chain, whereas the "why" questions seek to find what, if any, are the earlier (or more fundamental) links in the causal chain.

      --
      If a cat has kittens, does a rat have rittens, a bat bittens and a mat mittens?