People Are Jailbreaking Used Teslas to Get the Features They Expect:
People have certain expectations when they buy a car. For example, they expect it to work for years afterwards needing only basic maintenance. They also expect that the purchase price includes ownership of not only the physical car itself but all the software that runs it.
Tesla doesn't agree.
Last week, Jalopnik ran an article about a person who bought a used Tesla from a dealer—who in turn bought it at auction directly from Tesla under California's lemon law buyback program—advertised as having Autopilot, the company's Advanced Driver Assistance System. The entire Autopilot package, which the car had when the dealer bought it, costs an extra $8,000. Then, Tesla remotely removed the software because "Full-Self Driving was not a feature that you had paid for." Tesla said if the customer wanted Autopilot back, he'd have to fork over the $8,000.
Tesla clawing back software upgrades from used cars is not a new practice for the company. "Tesla as a policy has been doing this for years on salvage cars," said Phil Sadow, an independent Tesla repair professional. One former employee, who used to work in an official Tesla service center and asked to remain anonymous because he still works with Tesla in another capacity, said he was told to put the software features back if people complained to avoid bad publicity. He left about a year ago.
But that doesn't mean Tesla owners are helpless. Sadow and others have ways to push back against Tesla by jailbreaking the cars and getting the features owners feel are rightfully theirs.
"As far as I am concerned removing a paid-for feature, regardless of the state of the car, is theft," Sadow said. "It's as if a bunch of guys show up in a van and take your upgraded 20" wheels. Just because it's software, it's no different."
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday February 13 2020, @03:51PM (1 child)
I would also mention: First Sale Doctrine.
Once you buy it, including bells and whistles, it is yours. You can resell it.
There was even a court case about someone buying some kind of software bundle from Adobe, and then later reselling parts of it, such as Photoshop or Illustrator, without selling the entire bundle.
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 3, Informative) by barbara hudson on Friday February 14 2020, @01:07AM
Even a copyright violation doesn't give you the right to remotely disable software or barge into a store selling pirated copies and taking them. You need to go through the courts or the cops. Tesla is no exception.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.