Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday February 13 2020, @02:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the putting-a-new-spin-on-things dept.

In a paper published today in Nature Communications, UNSW quantum computing researchers describe how they created artificial atoms in a silicon 'quantum dot', a tiny space in a quantum circuit where electrons are used as qubits (or quantum bits), the basic units of quantum information.

Scientia Professor Andrew Dzurak explains that unlike a real atom, an artificial atom has no nucleus, but it still has shells of electrons whizzing around the centre of the device, rather than around the atom's nucleus.

[...] [Ph.D. student Ross] Leon, who ran the experiments, says the researchers were interested in what happened when an extra electron began to populate a new outer shell. In the periodic table, the elements with just one electron in their outer shells include Hydrogen and the metals Lithium, Sodium and Potassium.

"When we create the equivalent of Hydrogen, Lithium and Sodium in the quantum dot, we are basically able to use that lone electron on the outer shell as a qubit," Ross says.

"Up until now, imperfections in silicon devices at the atomic level have disrupted the way qubits behave, leading to unreliable operation and errors. But it seems that the extra electrons in the inner shells act like a 'primer' on the imperfect surface of the quantum dot, smoothing things out and giving stability to the electron in the outer shell."

[...] It is the spin of an electron that we use to encode the value of the qubit, explains Professor Dzurak.

[...] "When the electrons in either a real atom, or our artificial atoms, form a complete shell, they align their poles in opposite directions so that the total spin of the system is zero, making them useless as a qubit. But when we add one more electron to start a new shell, this extra electron has a spin that we can now use as a qubit again.

"Our new work shows that we can control the spin of electrons in the outer shells of these artificial atoms to give us reliable and stable qubits.

Journal Reference:
Leon, R.C.C., Yang, C.H., Hwang, J.C.C. et al. "Coherent spin control of s-, p-, d- and f-electrons in a silicon quantum dot." Nat Commun 11, 797 (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14053-w


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 13 2020, @06:20PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 13 2020, @06:20PM (#957787)

    bohrs orbital type electrons v superposition

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by maxwell demon on Friday February 14 2020, @12:16PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Friday February 14 2020, @12:16PM (#958141) Journal

    Bohr's model had orbits, not orbitals. Orbitals are the single-electron quantum eigenstates predicted by quantum mechanics. Orbital states are still an approximation (because they neglect electron correlations and treat the electromagnetic field classically) but a much better one than Bohr's orbits. Since orbitals are genuine quantum states, deviations from the orbital model can usually be calculated using perturbation theory. And of course, superpositions of them are well-defined (and actually are quite common in chemistry, known there as hybridization).

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.