Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday February 15 2020, @09:51PM   Printer-friendly
from the Gurdjieff-taught-it-is-not-so-easy-to-remember-yourself dept.

A weekly financial newsletter included this link, https://www.titlemax.com/discovery-center/lifestyle/50-cognitive-biases-to-be-aware-of-so-you-can-be-the-very-best-version-of-you/. A cute graphical "flash card" version of the same list is available at https://www.visualcapitalist.com/50-cognitive-biases-in-the-modern-world/ Each "card" includes a short example that I found helpful in understanding the definitions.

Along with the ever-popular Dunning-Kruger Effect, the list had some eye openers for me. Here are the first ten. As a mental exercise, think about how many more you are aware of...before going to either of the links for a peek:

1. Fundamental Attribution Error: We judge others on their personality or fundamental character, but we judge ourselves on the situation.

2. Self-Serving Bias: Our failures are situational, but our successes are our responsibility.

3. In-Group Favoritism: We favor people who are in our in-group as opposed to an out-group.

4. Bandwagon Effect: Ideas, fads, and beliefs grow as more people adopt them.

5. Groupthink: Due to a desire for conformity and harmony in the group, we make irrational decisions, often to minimize conflict.

6. Halo Effect: If you see a person as having a positive trait, that positive impression will spill over into their other traits. (This also works for negative traits.)

7. Moral Luck: Better moral standing happens due to a positive outcome; worse moral standing happens due to a negative outcome.

8. False Consensus: We believe more people agree with us than is actually the case.

9. Curse of Knowledge: Once we know something, we assume everyone else knows it, too.

10. Spotlight Effect: We overestimate how much people are paying attention to our behavior and appearance.

At some level, I suppose this is click-bait--but this bait got me thinking.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Coward, Anonymous on Sunday February 16 2020, @02:30AM (6 children)

    by Coward, Anonymous (7017) on Sunday February 16 2020, @02:30AM (#958664) Journal

    Can we just summarize this as humans are fallible?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 16 2020, @03:09AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 16 2020, @03:09AM (#958672)

    Where's the -1 party pooper mod?

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by Coward, Anonymous on Sunday February 16 2020, @04:07AM

      by Coward, Anonymous (7017) on Sunday February 16 2020, @04:07AM (#958687) Journal

      That would count as #3 In-Group Favoritism. Also Naïve Realism, Availability Cascade, Law of Triviality, and possibly IKEA Effect.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 17 2020, @04:04PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 17 2020, @04:04PM (#959190)

    Can we just summarize this as humans are fallible?

    That's like setting your jpeg compression settings to "make the whole picture a shade of gray and call it a day".

  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Saturday February 22 2020, @12:55PM (2 children)

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Saturday February 22 2020, @12:55PM (#961008) Homepage Journal

    Can we just summarize this as humans are fallible?

    Only if we don't want to compensate for bias in order to become more objective.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Coward, Anonymous on Sunday February 23 2020, @08:55AM (1 child)

      by Coward, Anonymous (7017) on Sunday February 23 2020, @08:55AM (#961350) Journal

      The errors I catch myself making and also see in others are more basic than some subtle "bias". Correcting for bias is like making declination adjustments to a compass reading. First we need to know which end of the needle points North, and which end points South.