Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday February 16 2020, @02:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the when-will-we-learn? dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Flaws in the blockchain app some states plan to use in the 2020 election allow bad actors to alter or cancel someone’s vote or expose their private info.

Security researchers have found key flaws in a mobile voting app that some states plan to use in the 2020 election that can allow hackers to launch both client- and server-side attacks that can easily manipulate or even delete someone’s vote, as well as prevent a reliable audit from taking place after the fact, they said.

A team of researchers at MIT released a security audit of Voatz—a blockchain app that already was used in a limited way for absentee-ballot voting in the 2018 mid-term elections—that they said bolsters the case for why internet voting is a bad idea and voting transparency is the only way to ensure legitimacy.

West Virginia was the first state to use Voatz, developed by a Boston-based company of the same name, in the mid-term election, marking the inaugural use of internet voting in a high-stakes federal election. The app primarily collected votes from absentee ballots of military service personnel stationed overseas. Other counties in Utah and Colorado also used the app last year in a limited way for municipal elections.

However, despite the company’s claim that the app has a number of security features that make it safe for such an auspicious use—including immutability via its use of a permissioned blockchain, end-to-end voting encryption, voter anonymity, device compromise detection, and a voter-verified audit trail–the MIT team found that any attacker that controls the user’s device through some very rudimentary flaws can brush aside these protections.

“We find that an attacker with root privileges on the device can disable all of Voatz’s host-based protections, and therefore stealthily control the user’s vote, expose her private ballot, and exfiltrate the user’s PIN and other data used to authenticate the server,” MIT researchers Michael A. Specter, James Koppe and Daniel Weitzner wrote in their paper (PDF), “The Ballot is Busted Before the Blockchain: A Security Analysis of Voatz, the First Internet Voting Application Used in U.S.Federal Elections.”

[...] One voting district in Washington state—Mason County–already has pulled its plans to use Voatz in November, according to the New York Times, while West Virginia is moving ahead with its plans to expand Voatz used to disabled voters, the paper reported.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday February 16 2020, @11:47AM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Sunday February 16 2020, @11:47AM (#958759) Homepage
    The US seems to like obfuscated Rube Goldberg mechanisms to shoehorn unnecessary technology into the world of elections, but Estonia seems to be doing it right. All my mates have been eVoting for half a decade. The security's end-to-end based on the smartchip on your ID card, and when weaknesses with those have been found (three times that I remember in the last 10 years, and at least one of those I considered not severe enough to be worth reacting to) cards are replaced /en masse/. Tom Scott did do a video criticising electronic voting recently which was quite convincing, and he did mention Estonia, but according to smart friends locally, the criticisms he mentioned ceased to be relevant about 6 years ago.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Monday February 17 2020, @01:45AM (1 child)

    by hemocyanin (186) on Monday February 17 2020, @01:45AM (#958972) Journal

    Americans are apparently too stupid and uninformed for us to require ID cards for voting. At least according to Democrats.

    • (Score: 2) by dry on Monday February 17 2020, @06:02AM

      by dry (223) on Monday February 17 2020, @06:02AM (#959049) Journal

      The problem with ID is it another means to disenfranchise people if the implementers so choose.
      I've needed ID to vote for the longest time and up till the Conservatives, with advice from the Republicans got to change the rules, it worked fine and after those arseholes got voted out, it is once again working fine.
      What's funny is that I can get American ID, legally and then I guess vote as I'd have a drivers license and look and sound American. I'd imagine there are a lot of permanent residents and illegals with ID.