Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday February 18 2020, @08:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the identical-drug-Synacthen-in-Canada-costs-about-$33 dept.

Television station WSB-TV 2 in Atlanta, Georgia reports Metro city sues drug manufacturer over '97,500% price increase' for seizure medicine:

The city of Marietta, Georgia is suing drug manufacturer Mallinckrodt after Mallinckrodt increased the price of the drug Acthar by 97,500%.

"Acthar used to cost $40, but Mallinckrodt has raised the price of the drug to over $39,000 per vial," the city claims in its lawsuit. "This eye-popping 97,500% price increase is the result of unlawful and unfair conduct by Mallinckrondt. The City has expended over $2 million for just one patient covered by the city's self-funded health plan."

Atlanta pharmacist Ira Katz said Acthar is what's called a "biologic" and they can be classified as specialty drugs.

"They put them into the specialty class, and the prices are outrageous, just outrageous," Katz said.

The company sent a response to the station's request for comment. In part, it states:

In 2017, Mallinckrodt specifically offered to work with representatives for the City of Marietta in response to inquiries the City had made about the price of Acthar. The City declined to meaningfully participate in that process.

"Mallinckrodt acquired Acthar in August 2014, well after the price increase you reference in 2007 was undertaken by Questcor, the previous owner of Acthar. Under our stewardship, any price adjustments to Acthar have been limited to the mid-single digit percentage range. We want to help ensure patients have access to and can benefit from our therapies. That's why we offer significant discounts to many payers and customers, which the prior owner did not. Additionally, Mallinckrodt offers a range of robust free drug and commercial copay assistance options for patients, in compliance with applicable laws.

Apparently, there is a long history of complaints about the pricing for Acthar. See, for example, this December 2016 story in The New York Times. Here's another where CBS' 60 Minutes did an investigation. Then there are these two June 2018 stories from CNN. The focus of the first story is an overview of this drug's price and history. The second story has as its focus the impact on a single child and his family.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by FatPhil on Tuesday February 18 2020, @02:18PM (3 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday February 18 2020, @02:18PM (#959518) Homepage
    Those statements are no more contradictory than "gravity causes rivers to flow" and "gravity causes lakes to form" are contradictory.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Underrated=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by loonycyborg on Tuesday February 18 2020, @06:01PM (2 children)

    by loonycyborg (6905) on Tuesday February 18 2020, @06:01PM (#959609)

    This analogy is flawed since my original point was about underlying moral imperative of people, not about laws of physics that determine which actions are within realm of possibility. Which you prefer to exist? Competitive market or single monolithic structure with you doing all decisions directly or indirectly? This is two totally different worldviews and if you think that as soon as you achieve dominant position by taking advantage of the free market any rational need for said free market magically disappears then your worldview is bordering on solipsism. Yet this is how goals of a business are seen by most people nowadays, at least on ideological level.

    • (Score: 1, Redundant) by FatPhil on Wednesday February 19 2020, @09:45AM (1 child)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Wednesday February 19 2020, @09:45AM (#959832) Homepage
      Which do I prefer, flowing rivers, or giant placid lakes? I prefer you reread my post, and try to understand the wisdom contained within.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 2) by loonycyborg on Wednesday February 19 2020, @10:29AM

        by loonycyborg (6905) on Wednesday February 19 2020, @10:29AM (#959836)

        Well then you can consider capitalism to be about flooding entire earth to become one big ocean while extolling relative benefits of lakes and rivers.