Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday February 19 2020, @12:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the to-infinity-and-beyond,maybe dept.

SpaceX announces partnership to send four tourists into deep orbit:

SpaceX announced a new partnership Tuesday to send four tourists deeper into orbit than any private citizen before them, in a mission that could take place by 2022 and easily cost more than $100 million.

The company signed the deal with Space Adventures, which is based in Washington and served as an intermediary to send eight space tourists to the International Space Station (ISS) via Russian Soyuz rockets.

The first of these was Dennis Tito, who paid $20 million for an eight hour stay on the ISS back in 2001. The last to go was Cirque du Soleil founder Guy Laliberte, in 2009.

The new tourists would be carried on SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsule, which was developed to transport NASA astronauts and is due to make its first crewed flight in the coming months.

"Our goal is to try to get to about two to three times the height of the space station," Space Adventure's president Tom Shelley told AFP.

The ISS orbits at 400 kilometers (250 miles) above Earth's surface, but the exact altitude of the Space Adventures mission would be determined by SpaceX, added Shelley.

At its earliest, it could take place by late 2021, though "probably more likely is sometime in 2022," he said.

The capsule was designed to take astronauts from the surface to the ISS. Just nine square meters in volume[sic], there are no private areas to sleep wash or use the bathroom.

Mission duration will depend on what the customers want, said Shelley.

Space Adventures has posted its official announcement on its website.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 19 2020, @12:51PM (11 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 19 2020, @12:51PM (#959844)
    There should be something to visit up there. They could put up a Bigelow inflatable habitat [nasaspaceflight.com] for example. It could be reused for multiple tourist flights. Could be expanded into a commercial space station with multiple modules. If they're already spending $100 million on the mission, Why not invest a few hundred million more, and put something interesting up there. Although the view of the Earth and the star background is already interesting.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 19 2020, @01:13PM (3 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday February 19 2020, @01:13PM (#959845) Journal

    Bigelow has already paid SpaceX for up to 4 private trips to the ISS [spaceflightnow.com]:

    Bigelow Space Operations says it will charge $52 million per seat to send private astronauts to the International Space Station aboard Crew Dragon ferry ships, and has already paid “substantial sums” to SpaceX for up to four dedicated crew missions to the orbiting research complex.

    Bigelow's big plans for inflatable hotels haven't gone anywhere. They haven't sent any more modules to the ISS. They probably need Starship or SLS to launch their giant BA 2100 [wikipedia.org] if that ever gets built.

    While the ISS has been using a Bigelow prototype [wikipedia.org] as a broom closet, NASA has gone with a different, Boeing-backed company [spaceflightnow.com] to provide real use of inflatables:

    NASA has selected Axiom Space, a Houston-based startup partnering with Boeing and other aerospace contractors, to attach a commercial habitat to the International Space Station and begin constructing an orbiting complex that the company says could ultimately replace the international research outpost.

    Axiom won a NASA competition to connect a commercial module to the forward port on space station’s Harmony module, or Node 2, officials announced Monday. NASA made available the port in a commercial solicitation last June, asking companies for proposals to join a public-private partnership with the space agency to develop and demonstrate technologies for a future commercial space station.

    [...] NASA says it selected Axiom to provide at least one commercial module for attachment to the space station. But Axiom has more ambitious objectives.

    Axiom says it plans to build and launch several modules to form the “Axiom Segment” of the International Space Station. The company said it targets launch of the first module in the latter half of 2024.

    The elements planned by Axiom include a node module, an orbital research and manufacturing facility, a crew habitat, and a “large-windowed Earth observatory” that is similar in appearance to the International Space Station’s cupola module. Axiom said the new commercial segment will add more research and habitation facilities to the ISS, and provide “novel avenues of research in areas such as isolation studies and Earth observation.”

    Research currently conducted on the ISS could be transferred to the new commercial facility gradually to prevent interruptions with the ISS is retired, Axiom said in a statement.

    While its partnership with NASA is focused on connecting a module to the International Space Station, Axiom plans to detach its commercial modules when the ISS reaches its retirement date, forming a standalone, free-flying commercial orbital station. Before the International Space Station is decommissioned and the Axiom Segment is detached, Axiom aims to launch a solar power platform to provide the commercial modules the electricity and cooling previously provided by the ISS.

    [...] The industry team assembled by Axiom includes Boeing and Thales Alenia Space of Italy. Boeing and Thales built most of the pressurized modules on the U.S. segment the International Space Station, and Boeing’s Starliner commercial crew capsule could fly private astronauts to and from the ISS and the Axiom station.

    Bigelow was *the* big name in inflatable modules, now it looks like they are paying SpaceX to send tourists to a competitor's modules.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 19 2020, @01:54PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 19 2020, @01:54PM (#959851)

      Yeah, I guess windows are important. Bigelow should build something independent with the experience they aquired.

    • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Wednesday February 19 2020, @03:59PM

      by Immerman (3985) on Wednesday February 19 2020, @03:59PM (#959888)

      >Bigelow's big plans for inflatable hotels haven't gone anywhere.
      Where would they go? Last I heard they're still waiting for rockets big enough to launch their production model B330 (though... I think Falcon Heavy might be just capable)

      >They haven't sent any more modules to the ISS.
      Why would they? The current BEAM module is a long-term proof-of-concept module that's doubling as a storage closet. Not any point in sending up anything else until NASA or one of the other space agencies involved is prepared to purchase a B330 to add useful capacity to the ISS

      Given the resounding success of the BEAM, I'm rather surprised that NASA would select some unproven startup to expand the ISS with more metal cans, rather than at least including a Bigelow module in the plan. I'm wondering if there's some political maneuvering or other non-technical reasoning behind that decision.

      On the other hand, last I heard Bigelow was still planning to launch their own independent commercial space station within the next few years. Perhaps with those plans in place, they just weren't feeling "cooperative" enough to play ball with NASA as well.

      Hmm, or perhaps NASA is intentionally positioning themselves as a proving ground to foster commercial development in the space station market. With Bigelow having a business plan and proven technology for large-volume habitation and work modules, fostering another company specializing in more traditional hard modules could be a smart move - there's lots of more complicated systems that aren't well suited to direct integration into inflatable modules. And assuming both companies are designing to the ISS's standard for linking modules, you should be able to mix-and-match Bigelow and Axiom modules as desired for future space stations.

  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Wednesday February 19 2020, @01:21PM (2 children)

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Wednesday February 19 2020, @01:21PM (#959847) Journal

    There should be something to visit up there.

    Once the Moon Nazis [wikipedia.org] have been vanquished they should build a retirement colony on the Moon. Old people will enjoy the micro-gravity and the pants-optional Fridays.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 1) by Kitsune008 on Wednesday February 19 2020, @03:34PM (1 child)

      by Kitsune008 (9054) on Wednesday February 19 2020, @03:34PM (#959879)

      Yeah, but if they send most USAians, they will have to watch out for the 'Whalers on the Moon' mistaking them for prey. ;-)

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 19 2020, @05:22PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 19 2020, @05:22PM (#959914)

        If the 'Whalers on the Moon' puncture Trumps ego he's liable to explode.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 19 2020, @10:31PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 19 2020, @10:31PM (#960044)

    Why not invest a few hundred million more, and put something interesting up there.

    I know! Pornhub originals studio. will get younger generations interested in space.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 20 2020, @12:51AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 20 2020, @12:51AM (#960104)

      Nothing sexier than throwing up in zero-g.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 20 2020, @03:00PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 20 2020, @03:00PM (#960291)

        Hmmm. Vomit flying around in zero-G wasn't the bodily fluid I was thinking here.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 20 2020, @07:35PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 20 2020, @07:35PM (#960417)

          You don't get a choice. Half of the would-be stars will get space sickness.