Safari will, later this year, no longer accept new HTTPS certificates that expire more than 13 months from their creation date. That means websites using long-life SSL/TLS certs issued after the cut-off point will throw up privacy errors in Apple's browser.
The policy was unveiled by the iGiant at a Certification Authority Browser Forum (CA/Browser) meeting on Wednesday. Specifically, according to those present at the confab, from September 1, any new website cert valid for more than 398 days will not be trusted by the Safari browser and instead rejected. Older certs, issued prior to the deadline, are unaffected by this rule.
By implementing the policy in Safari, Apple will, by extension, enforce it on all iOS and macOS devices. This will put pressure on website admins and developers to make sure their certs meet Apple's requirements – or risk breaking pages on a billion-plus devices and computers.
[...] Shortening the lifespan of certificates does come with some drawbacks. It has been noted that by increasing the frequency of certificate replacements, Apple and others are also making life a little more complicated for site owners and businesses that have to manage the certificates and compliance.
"Companies need to look to automation to assist with certificate deployment, renewal, and lifecycle management to reduce human overhead and the risk of error as the frequency of certificate replacement increase," Callan told us.
We note Let's Encrypt issues free HTTPS certificates that expire after 90 days, and provides tools to automate renewals, so those will be just fine – and they are used all over the web now. El Reg's cert is a year-long affair so we'll be OK.
GitHub.com uses a two-year certificate, which would fall foul of Apple's rules though it was issued before the cut-off deadline. However, it is due to be renewed by June, so there's plenty of opportunity to sort that out. Apple's website has a year-long HTTPS cert that needs renewing in October.
Microsoft is an interesting one: its dot-com's cert is a two-year affair, which expires in October. If Redmond renews it for another two years, it'll trip up over Safari's policy.
(Score: 2) by sjames on Tuesday February 25 2020, @12:19AM (1 child)
Let's encrypt is good enough for websites that honestly were fine without encryption, or for user/pass login to various fora, but you need more for your bank or the source for your software updates (for example).
The utter failure to actually implement revocation is not fixed by making changed certs LESS suspicious. Especially under the current sustem where CAs are legion. Have a look at the list of root CAs in your browser. Can you honestly say you've even heard of more than 10% of them? Any one might at any time be fooled into issuing a cert for your bank or Microsoft (the latter has actually happened). For that scenario, lasting for 2 years isn't much different than lasting for a year really, but if the sudden change raised red flags, it would reduce the problem substantially.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 25 2020, @05:02AM
Yes I can but then again I deleted most of the root CAs, leaving only ones that I trust.