Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Monday February 24 2020, @09:07PM   Printer-friendly
from the assigned-names-expensive-numbers dept.

Get ready for price hikes up to 10% annually after sale of .org registry:

The nonprofit Internet Society attracted widespread condemnation late last year after announcing it was going to sell off the Public Interest Registry, a subsidiary that administers the .org domain, to a private equity firm called Ethos Capital. People were particularly alarmed because the move came shortly after ICANN removed price caps on registration and renewal fees for .org domains. That opened the prospect of big price hikes in the coming years.

In a Friday press release, Ethos Capital announced it would voluntarily commit to limit price hikes for the next eight years. But under the new rules, Ethos Capital would still be able to raise prices by 10 percent a year—which would more than double prices over the next eight years. Ethos framed this as a concession to the public, and strictly speaking, a 10 percent price hike limit is better for customers than completely uncapped fees. But 10 percent annual increases are still massive—far more than inflation or plausible increases in the cost of running the infrastructure powering the .org registry.

For comparison, ICANN recently announced that Verisign, the company that administers the .com domain, will be allowed to raise prices by 7 percent per year over the next decade, except for a two-year "pause" after four years of hikes. Those changes, adding up to a 70-percent price hike over 10 years, was enough to trigger alarm among domain registrars who must pass these fees on to their customers.

Ethos Capital's proposed limits are also much more than historical increases in the .org fee. The maximum fee charged by the Public Interest Registry for a domain registration has risen from $6 at the end of 2006 to $9.93 today—an annual growth rate of less than 5 percent.

Previously: Now Internet Society Told to Halt Controversial .Org Sale... by its Own Advisory Council


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Booga1 on Monday February 24 2020, @09:53PM (2 children)

    by Booga1 (6333) on Monday February 24 2020, @09:53PM (#962020)

    More than ironic, malicious. ICANN sold out most of the domain name system years ago. They're just accelerating the pace of selling out the rest of it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by barbara hudson on Monday February 24 2020, @10:45PM (1 child)

    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Monday February 24 2020, @10:45PM (#962051) Journal
    The world doesn't need monopolies. AlterNIC fixed this [wikipedia.org]. No reason browsers can't be configured to use alternative root name servers. With ipv6 we could have a distributed DNS that gave everyone their own unique entry.
    --
    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
    • (Score: 2) by Booga1 on Monday February 24 2020, @10:53PM

      by Booga1 (6333) on Monday February 24 2020, @10:53PM (#962058)

      I remember that stuff. I thought it was silly at the time. It seemed strange to want unofficial "fake" domains. Now it's starting to look reasonable.