Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday August 29 2014, @06:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the see,-no-hands dept.

The Car Connection reports that back in May Google unveiled the prototype of its first autonomous car built in-house but there were a few features that the new model lacked — for example, a steering wheel and brake pedal. Now, California's DMV has told Google to return those accouterments to their traditional locations so that riders can take "immediate physical control" of the car, if necessary. That and other autonomous vehicle regulations kick in on September 15.

"This isn't a huge setback for Google," writes Richard Reed. "After all, the prototypes aren't nearly ready for primetime, they're just being used for tests. Though the control-less models have worked fine on closed tracks, with no accidents to date, they'll eventually be navigating real streets in real traffic, so they'll need to be up to code. In fact, the DMV may tighten up things a bit further next month, when it issues regulations concerning test vehicles on public roads." In the long run, though, we'd expect the DMV to loosen some of these restrictions. It will undoubtedly take years for regulators and the public to begin trusting autonomous cars — and even then, it's likely that automakers will keep some kind of manual override system in place. After all, given the safety records of autonomous cars — records that will certainly improve with the rollout of vehicle-to-vehicle technology — we're hopeful that motorists will (almost) never need to use them.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by evilviper on Friday August 29 2014, @12:11PM

    by evilviper (1760) on Friday August 29 2014, @12:11PM (#87158) Homepage Journal

    You're not going to sell many cars with just a joystick for steering until you have drivers who are trained, and you're not going to get a lot of trained drivers with no way to practice driving with a joystick.

    Unless manufacturers simply include BOTH types of controls in cars for a few years... Giving everyone time to catch up.

    I don't recall driver's ed' and testing needing to be updated to deal with cruise control, touch-screens, back-up cameras, etc., etc.

    --
    Hydrogen cyanide is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Vanderhoth on Friday August 29 2014, @12:30PM

    by Vanderhoth (61) on Friday August 29 2014, @12:30PM (#87166)

    I don't recall driver's ed' and testing needing to be updated to deal with cruise control, touch-screens, back-up cameras, etc., etc.

    Yeah... But those things aren't really critical to operating the car. There's a huge difference in feel when driving with a steering wheel to driving with a joystick. Joysticks are going to be way more sensitive, require much smaller movements to preform the same operation and the action (turning the wheel vs. pushing the joystick from side to side) are much different as well. I know lots of people that royally suck at video games simply because they just can't handle the control style.

    I could see some huge advantages to a controller though, someone that's paralyzed from the waste down, or "little people" too short to reach the peddle could operate break and gas and steer the car with just their hands. But again as it is now they usually have vehicles modified to have an accelerator/break buttons on the steering wheel so really the controller still isn't necessary and would be a huge change in control style.

    --
    "Now we know", "And knowing is half the battle". -G.I. Joooooe