Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday March 02 2020, @05:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the droned-out-for-a-second dept.

New FAA drone rule is a giant middle finger to aviation hobbyists:

More than 34,000 people have deluged the Federal Aviation Administration with comments over a proposed regulation that would require almost every drone in the sky to broadcast its location over the Internet at all times. The comments are overwhelmingly negative, with thousands of hobbyists warning that the rules would impose huge new costs on those who simply wanted to continue flying model airplanes, home-built drones, or other personally owned devices.

"These regulations could kill a hobby I love," wrote Virginian Irby Allen Jr. in a comment last week. "RC aviation has brought my family together and if these regulations are enacted we will no longer be able to fly nor be able to afford the hobby."

The new regulations probably wouldn't kill the hobby of flying radio-controlled airplanes outright, but it could do a lot of damage. Owners of existing drones and model airplanes would face new restrictions on when and where they could be used. The regulations could effectively destroy the market for kit aircraft and custom-designed drones by shifting large financial and paperwork burdens on the shoulders of consumers.

"I think it's going to be harmful to the community and harmful to the growth of the UAS industry," said Greg Reverdiau, co-founder of the Pilot Institute, in a Friday phone interview. He wrote a point-by-point critique of the FAA proposal that has circulated widely among aviation hobbyists.

The new rules are largely designed to address safety and security concerns raised by law enforcement agencies. They worry that drones flying too close to an airport could disrupt operations or even cause a crash. They also worry about terrorists using drones to deliver payloads to heavily populated areas.

To address these concerns, the new FAA rule would require all new drones weighing more than 0.55 pounds to connect over the Internet to one of several location-tracking databases (still to be developed by private vendors) and provide real-time updates on their location. That would enable the FAA or law enforcement agencies to see, at a glance, which registered drones are in any particular area.

But critics say the rules impose massive costs on thousands of law-abiding Americans who have been quietly flying model airplanes, quad-copters, and other small unmanned aircraft for years—and in many cases decades.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Monday March 02 2020, @06:45PM (3 children)

    by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Monday March 02 2020, @06:45PM (#965601) Journal

    Someone's been watching old Tom Selleck movies [wikipedia.org]!!!! :P :D

    --
    This sig for rent.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday March 02 2020, @07:28PM (2 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 02 2020, @07:28PM (#965622) Journal

    I don't recall having seen this movie. But if I did, it sounds pretty easily forgettable.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Monday March 02 2020, @07:53PM

      by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Monday March 02 2020, @07:53PM (#965640)

      It had Gene Simmons in it. I am going to assume it was just awful.

    • (Score: 2) by choose another one on Tuesday March 03 2020, @10:56AM

      by choose another one (515) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 03 2020, @10:56AM (#965932)

      Not sure it was so easily forgettable, because I recalled the same movie (well, probably the same scene) in response to your comment (basically - "seen that in a movie back in the 80s).

      Couldn't have given you the title of the movie, or named the actors, nor can I give you a single line of dialogue, or plot (other than good guys vs. bad guy) but the _tech_, that was memorable:

      * the almost ludicrously large tracking bullets that locked onto your "unique" heat signature and followed you round corners etc. before blowing a large hole in you
      * the fact that they were _slow_ (for bullets), no need for bullet time (hadn't been invented yet :-), plenty of time to run away, dramatically, but the bullet always found you...
      * the dinky little bomb cars that drove themselves between the wheels of other cars before blowing up under the target (that's the scene)
      * acid injecting robo-spiders, nuff said

      All the tech (I think) was autonomous fire-and-forget, the bad guy forgot this and got killed by his own creations as a result

      That is about _all_ I remember of the film, but that has all stuck after 30+ yrs.