Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Monday March 02 2020, @09:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the holding-your-water dept.

A dam right across the North Sea: A defense against climate change, but primarily a warning:
[Ed Note: English version of the story follows the Dutch version - Fnord666]

A 475-km-long dam between the north of Scotland and the west of Norway and another one of 160 km between the west point of France and the southwest of England could protect more than 25 million Europeans against the consequences of an expected sea level rise of several metres over the next few centuries. The costs, 250-500 billion euros, are "merely" 0.1% of the gross national product, annualy over 20 years, of all the countries that would be protected by such a dam. That's what Dr Sjoerd Groeskamp, oceanographer at the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, calculated together with his Swedish colleague Joakim Kjellson at GEOMAR in Kiel, Germany, published this month in the scientific journal the Bulletin of the American Meterological Society. 'Besides being a possible solution, the design of such an extreme dam is mainly a warning', says Groeskamp. 'It reveals the immensity of the problem hanging over our heads.'

[...] The authors acknowledge that the consequences of this dam for North Sea wildlife would be considerable. 'The tide would disappear in a large part of the North Sea, and with it the transport of silt and nutrients. The sea would eventually even become a freshwater lake. That will drastically change the ecosystem and therefore have an impact on the fishing industry as well', Groeskamp elaborates.

[...] Ultimately, the description of this extreme dam is more of a warning than a solution, Groeskamp states. 'The costs and the consequences of such a dam are huge indeed. However, we have calculated that the cost of doing nothing against sea level rise will ultimately be many times higher. This dam makes it almost tangible what the consequences of the sea level rise will be; a sea level rise of 10 metres by the year 2500 according to the bleakest scenarios. This dam is therefore mainly a call to do something about climate change now. If we do nothing, then this extreme dam might just be the only solution.'

Sjoerd Groeskamp, Joakim Kjellsson. NEED The Northern European Enclosure Dam for if climate change mitigation fails. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2020; DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0145.1


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by legont on Tuesday March 03 2020, @03:02AM (3 children)

    by legont (4179) on Tuesday March 03 2020, @03:02AM (#965822)

    They will just fill the whole thing with sand and built new silicon valley on it.

    --
    "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday March 03 2020, @03:23AM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Tuesday March 03 2020, @03:23AM (#965833)

    So, Miami built a lot of the bayfront residential land by digging canals in the muck, and piling it up to get (barely) acceptable elevation to build homes on - I owned one of those homes built on the bay bottom material once - not the most attractive dirt you've ever dug in, even 80 years after it was pumped up.

    The fill material for a megaproject like filling the North Sea would undoubtedly have to come from the sediments of the Abyssal plains - if you think low tide during a red tide bloom smells bad....

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 2) by legont on Wednesday March 04 2020, @04:25AM (1 child)

      by legont (4179) on Wednesday March 04 2020, @04:25AM (#966337)

      I intended it as a joke but only half a joke. After all Russians built a dam around Sait Petersburg and they did have the same issues, but they built water treatment facilities and they worked so shit smell never came and the ecology actually became better and they are adding valuable real estate albeit slowly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Petersburg_Dam [wikipedia.org]
      I may be wrong, but I feel that pollution is an order of magnitude worse problem than rising sea level.

      --
      "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
      • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday March 04 2020, @01:35PM

        by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday March 04 2020, @01:35PM (#966448)

        pollution is an order of magnitude worse problem than rising sea level.

        All a matter of perspective. I think if we can stop the collapse of the wild ecosystems, everything else will work itself out. Controlling pollution is, of course, a part of that, and the changes that are leading to sea level rise are also doing major damage to wild ecosystems.

        --
        🌻🌻 [google.com]