Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
ARM CPU vendor Ampere announced an 80-core CPU called the Altra on Tuesday. If the core count didn't clue you in already, the Altra is aimed at data-center computing rather than home or even typical business needs. The Altra's 80 cores do not offer hyperthreading, so 80 cores here means 80 threads as well.
Before we go into too much detail about the Altra—which is currently sampling but is not yet generally available and does not have any third-party benchmarks—it's instructive to take a look slightly backward to its little sibling, the 32-core eMAG 8180.
The Altra is not Ampere's first entry into data-center ARM computing. Its last processor, the eMAG 8180, is a 32-core part running at up to 3.3GHz turbo. The eMAG 8180 is available in packet.net's c2.large.arm package, in the form of Lenovo's ThinkSystem HR330A 1u single-socket systems.
Kinvolk, a Berlin-based Linux development company, did some pretty extensive benchmarking of a single-socket eMAG 8180 system—comparing it to a 24-core AMD Epyc 7401P (24c/48t) and a dual-socket Xeon Gold 5120 (28c/56t total).
[...] Like the eMAG, the Altra does not offer SMT (Simultaneous Multi Threading), so its 80 cores mean 80 threads. Unlike the eMAG, the Altra is designed for either single or dual-socket operation—so we can expect to see 160-core Altra-powered systems later in 2020. We know that there will be multiple SKUs, with a TDP range the data sheet specifies at 45W to 210W. But we don't know their individual details.
The fine print in Altra's slide deck claims 80 cores and 180W for the Altra under test, not 210W. This may imply adjustable thermal performance configurations similar to what one might see in laptop CPUs, but at this point it's just too soon to tell. The company claims—presumably, with dual-socket builds of the 80-core SKU—the highest rack density in the industry, at up to 3,500 cores per rack.
It's important to note that these performance numbers are thin at best. Not only are they Ampere-internal, they're "projected," not real. Further, the AMD and Intel performance numbers have been artificially decreased, to account for the fact that the Altra is using binaries compiled with GCC. Meanwhile, the AMD and Intel numbers were generated with CPU-optimized compilers. This drops the Epyc down to 83.5 percent of its real performance and the Xeon down to 76 percent of its.
This isn't sketchy, exactly—it's a fairly common industry practice, and Ampere disclosed it clearly enough in the presentation. But it's likely not what many people would expect. We should point out that the only performance numbers given here are SPECrate 2017_int_base—which is an extremely narrow integer math performance benchmark.
(Score: 2) by SemperOSS on Friday March 06 2020, @01:22PM (5 children)
OK, maybe just in a desktop with plenty of RAM and some giant harddisks. Should make my photo and video editing more easy … I hope.
I don't need a signature to draw attention to myself.
Maybe I should add a sarcasm warning now and again?
(Score: 2) by takyon on Friday March 06 2020, @01:30PM (1 child)
Don't believe anything until you see real benchmarks.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by SemperOSS on Friday March 06 2020, @05:51PM
That's what the "I hope" part covered … I hope ;-)
I don't need a signature to draw attention to myself.
Maybe I should add a sarcasm warning now and again?
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Acabatag on Friday March 06 2020, @03:12PM (2 children)
Then you can run Bochs on it so it will emulate an instruction set your software cab access.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by SemperOSS on Friday March 06 2020, @05:57PM (1 child)
I have not tried Bochs in many years as I never had the hardware for it, really. I wonder if you could make a decent x86 processor with a distributed version of Bochs and a cluster of RPis. The reason is that my RPis seem to breed — or maybe I just cannot resist buying more for no good rea… Hey look, there's a 4GB version now! I'll be back after exercising my credit card.
I don't need a signature to draw attention to myself.
Maybe I should add a sarcasm warning now and again?
(Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Friday March 06 2020, @10:12PM
Clusters of Pis are almost never a good idea outside of showing off. Performance per dollar is lacking.
https://www.servethehome.com/aoa-analysis-marvell-thunderx2-equals-190-raspberry-pi-4/3/ [servethehome.com]
But if you want to do it, this just came up:
https://linuxgizmos.com/four-slot-raspberry-pi-cluster-board-starts-at-80/ [linuxgizmos.com]
https://www.notebookcheck.net/CloverPI-Combine-four-Raspberry-Pi-boards-into-one-powerful-cluster-device.456003.0.html [notebookcheck.net]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]