What does it mean to "promote child exploitation"? When it's figurines that have been sold for years but now violate Amazon's statutes about promoting child exploitation which resulted in listings being removed. Chuck Gaffney has run a successful Amazon store for years selling anime-related products, up until recently when Amazon started cracking down on anything that could be perceived as "promoting child exploitation".
While it can be difficult for online retailers to represent themselves as selling genuine merchandise — meaning reputation means a lot — this type of behavior from the market owner is very discouraging. In response, the seller blames a "neopuritan crusade" against anime figures.
The characters at the center of this disagreement are: Hatsune Miku and Kaitō Tenshi Twin Angel.
It's a wonder that anything anime-related survives importation to the US from Japan.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by mobydisk on Monday March 09 2020, @09:03PM (3 children)
The problem is law enforcement an the courts. In 2008, United States v. Handley, a guy was given 6 months jail time for possessing a comic book. This is despite that fact that in 2002, the Supreme Court largely struck down the COPA. I believe all that stood is the modification of images so that they are indistinguishable from actual CP.
(Score: 2) by exaeta on Monday March 09 2020, @11:41PM (1 child)
The Government is a Bird
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 10 2020, @04:31AM
"only six months" in jail for an honest man. I sincerely believe the judiciary should have 6 months of jail as part of training.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 09 2020, @11:59PM
I'm not familiar with that case, but those kinds of images in a book wouldn't be illegal under COPA, they'd likely be illegal under pre-existing statutes. COPA was specific to online activities.