Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday March 10 2020, @09:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the tiny-homes dept.

Downsizing the McMansion: Study gauges a sustainable size for future homes:

What might homes of the future look like if countries were really committed to meeting global calls for sustainability, such as the recommendations advanced by the Paris Agreement and the U.N.'s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development?

Much wider adoption of smart design features and renewable energy for low- to zero-carbon homes is one place to start -- the U.N. estimates households consume 29% of global energy and consequently contribute to 21% of resultant CO2 emissions, which will only rise as global population increases.

However, a new scholarly paper authored at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) assesses another big factor in the needed transformation of our living spaces toward sustainability -- the size of our homes.

The paper published in the journal Housing, Theory & Society makes the case for transitioning away from the large, single-family homes that typify suburban sprawl, offering new conceptions for what constitutes a more sustainable and sufficient average home size in high-income countries going forward.

The article surveys more than 75 years of housing history and provides estimates for the optimal spatial dimensions that would align with an "environmentally tenable and globally equitable amount of per-person living area" today. It also spotlights five emerging cases of housing innovation around the world that could serve as models for effectively adopting more space-efficient homes of the future.

"There is no question that if we are serious about embracing our expressed commitments to sustainability, we will in the future need to live more densely and wisely," said Maurie Cohen, the paper's author and professor at NJIT's Department of Humanities. "This will require a complete reversal in our understanding of what it means to enjoy a 'good life' and we will need to start with the centerpiece of the 'American Dream,' namely the location and scale of our homes.

"The notion of 'bigger is better' will need to be supplanted by the question of 'how much is enough?' Fortunately, we are beginning to see examples of this process unfolding in some countries around the world, including the United States."

Maurie J. Cohen. New Conceptions of Sufficient Home Size in High-Income Countries: Are We Approaching a Sustainable Consumption Transition? Housing, Theory and Society, 2020; 1 DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1722218


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 11 2020, @12:45AM (3 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 11 2020, @12:45AM (#969373) Journal

    So, rather than set square footage targets, how about carbon emissions targets per person. Oh, wait, there's that variable again: number of people. While we're not on a global exponential growth curve anymore, the linear growth of global population continues around 75 million people per year, set for another doubling of population in 100 years (as opposed to the previous doubling that took only 50 years), if we continue this "rate of slowing" we might then only double again in 200 years, and again in 400 years, but, wait - that means that by 2700 we'll be trying to cram 60 billion people probably just on to the Earth, because... space is just too expensive. Hell, if we can't afford more than 900 square feet for a family of four, how can we afford a Mars colony? /rant

    Or transition to negative population growth. After all, the present stretch of linear growth indicates a dropping population growth rate.

  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday March 11 2020, @02:18AM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday March 11 2020, @02:18AM (#969426)

    Or transition to negative population growth.

    Faith is a wonderful thing, and better still for the faithful on this issue they'll be dead before they're proved right or wrong.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 11 2020, @03:01AM (1 child)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 11 2020, @03:01AM (#969452) Journal
      You were willing to project 400 years on faith.
      • (Score: 4, Touché) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday March 11 2020, @03:18AM

        by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday March 11 2020, @03:18AM (#969462)

        When you project the bad side, that's called cautious pessimism. The cautious pessimist isn't surprised as often by things going poorly. The cheerful optimist on the other hand can make Mad Max a reality.

        --
        🌻🌻 [google.com]