The fine folks at the CBC bring us the following report:
Participants in Ontario's prematurely cancelled basic income pilot project were happier, healthier and continued working even though they were receiving money with no-strings attached.
That's according to a new report titled Southern Ontario's Basic Income Experience, which was compiled by researchers at McMaster and Ryerson University, in partnership with the Hamilton Roundtable for Poverty Reduction.
The report shows nearly three-quarters of respondents who were working when the pilot project began kept at it despite receiving basic income.
That finding appears to contradict the criticism some levelled at the project, saying it would sap people's motivation to stay in the workforce or seek employment.
That's an interesting way of looking at it. An alternative viewpoint could be that over a quarter of the people who were working before the UBI trial stopped working. Unclear are the benefits that resulted from their new spare time — such as providing support to an ailing family member.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 11 2020, @03:41AM (4 children)
Not even wrong. OTOH, his idea of separation of powers (as revealed in the sacred Wikipedia texts [wikipedia.org]), which implicitly accepts that we have good reason to be afraid of another, has a far better fit with reality.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday March 11 2020, @01:30PM (3 children)
But, is that fear necessary for a good quality of life?
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 11 2020, @01:51PM (2 children)
Of course it is. Gullibility has a high cost when it comes to governance.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday March 11 2020, @05:01PM (1 child)
Careful how you read the Baron de Montesquieu, context and tone is important.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 13 2020, @12:03AM