The fine folks at the CBC bring us the following report:
Participants in Ontario's prematurely cancelled basic income pilot project were happier, healthier and continued working even though they were receiving money with no-strings attached.
That's according to a new report titled Southern Ontario's Basic Income Experience, which was compiled by researchers at McMaster and Ryerson University, in partnership with the Hamilton Roundtable for Poverty Reduction.
The report shows nearly three-quarters of respondents who were working when the pilot project began kept at it despite receiving basic income.
That finding appears to contradict the criticism some levelled at the project, saying it would sap people's motivation to stay in the workforce or seek employment.
That's an interesting way of looking at it. An alternative viewpoint could be that over a quarter of the people who were working before the UBI trial stopped working. Unclear are the benefits that resulted from their new spare time — such as providing support to an ailing family member.
(Score: 2) by Reziac on Thursday March 12 2020, @03:51AM (1 child)
The positive side of UBI would happen IF it replaced the entire gov't-welfare industry/bureaucracy. Of course, then you'd have a couple million useless people out of work, but, tradeoffs...
And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 12 2020, @06:54AM
They could take the jobs of everyone who drops out of the workforce to live on the UBI. I think bureacrats are currently paid more than a UBI, so that is a net win.