Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday March 12 2020, @06:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the how-do-you-crack-a-quantum? dept.

Engineers crack 58-year-old puzzle on way to quantum breakthrough:

[...] Generating magnetic fields requires large coils and high currents, while the laws of physics dictate that it is difficult to confine magnetic fields to very small spaces—they tend to have a wide area of influence. Electric fields, on the other hand, can be produced at the tip of a tiny electrode, and they fall off very sharply away from the tip. This will make control of individual atoms placed in nanoelectronic devices much easier.

[...] The researchers had originally set out to perform nuclear magnetic resonance on a single atom of antimony—an element that possesses a large nuclear spin. One of the lead authors of the work, Dr. Serwan Asaad, explains: "Our original goal was to explore the boundary between the quantum world and the classical world, set by the chaotic behaviour of the nuclear spin. This was purely a curiosity-driven project, with no application in mind."

"However, once we started the experiment, we realised that something was wrong. The nucleus behaved very strangely, refusing to respond at certain frequencies, but showing a strong response at others," recalls Dr. Vincent Mourik, also a lead author on the paper.

[...] Dr. Asaad continued: "What happened is that we fabricated a device containing an antimony atom and a special antenna, optimized to create a high-frequency magnetic field to control the nucleus of the atom. Our experiment demands this magnetic field to be quite strong, so we applied a lot of power to the antenna, and we blew it up!"

[...] "Normally, with smaller nuclei like phosphorus, when you blow up the antenna it's 'game over' and you have to throw away the device," says Dr. Mourik."But with the antimony nucleus, the experiment continued to work. It turns out that after the damage, the antenna was creating a strong electric field instead of a magnetic field. So we 'rediscovered' nuclear electric resonance."

After demonstrating the ability to control the nucleus with electric fields, the researchers used sophisticated computer modelling to understand how exactly the electric field influences the spin of the nucleus. This effort highlighted that nuclear electric resonance is a truly local, microscopic phenomenon: the electric field distorts the atomic bonds around the nucleus, causing it to reorient itself.

Journal Reference,:
Serwan Asaad, Vincent Mourik, Benjamin Joecker, Mark A. I. Johnson, Andrew D. Baczewski, Hannes R. Firgau, Mateusz T. Mądzik, Vivien Schmitt, Jarryd J. Pla, Fay E. Hudson, Kohei M. Itoh, Jeffrey C. McCallum, Andrew S. Dzurak, Arne Laucht1, Andrea Morello. Coherent electrical control of a single high-spin nucleus in silicon, Nature (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2057-7 , https://nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2057-7


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 12 2020, @06:55PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 12 2020, @06:55PM (#970343)

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe what is currently called MRI - magnetic resonance imaging, is basically the same as the earlier NMR - nuclear magnetic resonance. The change was made because the public equates "nuclear" with bombs, Chernobyl, etc.

    So, any guesses on the next name for NER - nuclear electric resonance? Perhaps this becomes ERI when commercialized?

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by DannyB on Thursday March 12 2020, @07:49PM (2 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 12 2020, @07:49PM (#970356) Journal

    Dangerous NMR was renamed to nice safe MRI because of how dangerous that letter N was considered to be.

    Removing the dangerous N from NER would leave simply ER. Which still might be considered dangerous.

    Idea: Electric Resonance Antenna or ERA. Doh! That doesn't work.

    Idea: Electric Resonance Field or ERF. But that sounds like smurf.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 12 2020, @09:33PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 12 2020, @09:33PM (#970394)

      Idea: stop labeling... "stuff".... as an idea

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 12 2020, @09:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 12 2020, @09:52PM (#970403)

      Maybe atomic electric resonance will fly - AER? After all atoms are mostly the nucleus (by weight).