German company CureVac has received a rather strange offer from the current White House.
On March 3, CureVac's CEO was invited to the White House, for a meeting with President Trump, Vice Pence and several members of the Coronavirus Task Force. Asked for when a vaccine could be ready, he estimated that a potential candidate could be ready within a few months. Apparently, that triggered the members of the meeting so much, that they've now offered to buy the company, at whatever price.
One condition though: production would be exclusively for the United States.
The move is not exactly one to gain popularity, and follows on the heels of the President's worrying statement that "a large number of new clusters in the United States were seeded by travelers from Europe".
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday March 16 2020, @05:26PM (3 children)
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday March 16 2020, @06:51PM (2 children)
If, hypothetically, there were some hypothetical effort to attempt to either
A) privately profit from a monopoly on a cure/treatment
B) favor a particular nation getting the cure/treatment
then,
I think that is definitely something worth caring about. People don't consider how they would like it if the she was on the other foot.
If some tyrannical dictatorial evil repressive and (omg!) socialist regime, say Sweden or Denmark, were to try to monopolize a cure/treatment, then people in the US would be mildly upset, I believe.
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday March 17 2020, @09:54AM (1 child)
It puts the cart before the horse to start speculating on what fanatical "Trumpers" will or won't do in a scenario when you don't have much in the way of evidence to support that the scenario happened, and are speculating on something that even if it happened and you cared, is defined to be trivially true (after all, anyone who didn't continue to support Trump under such a circumstance would certainly not be a Trumper!).
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday March 17 2020, @01:47PM
I used the word IF to separate issues and focus on whether this is worth caring about if it were to happen; rather than debate about whether or not it is happening.
Now if it is worth caring about, and if there is evidence it has happened, such as the German government confirming it, then that definitely makes it worth caring about.
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.