Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Sunday August 31 2014, @07:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the and-yet-it-moves dept.

Over at spacenews there is a report on an Israeli startup, called Effective Space Solutions which is proposing to use a microsatellite with an Ion drive to salvage the currently stranded Galileo satellites, as well as to provide extended lifespans for current satellites.

The 250-kilogram DeOrbiter, using ion-electric propulsion, is designed to perform multiple missions — more than 20, the company says — attaching and detaching from target satellites before being retired.

...

While the Galileo orbit-injection failure allowed EFS to ride a publicity wave, the principal mission of DeOrbiter is to extend the life of otherwise healthy satellites, mainly in geostationary orbit 36,000 kilometers over the equator, where commercial telecommunications satellites operate.

Interestingly it also looks like the company also has several competitors eyeing the robotic recovery and rescue of in-orbit satellites as a viable business.

Full Story at over at Spacenews.com

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Hairyfeet on Sunday August 31 2014, @09:40AM

    by Hairyfeet (75) <{bassbeast1968} {at} {gmail.com}> on Sunday August 31 2014, @09:40AM (#87798) Journal

    Well from what I understand the Ion drives while weak are VERY efficient and when you figure how much one of these birds cost AND how much the launch costs I can see how sending up a micro drone to work as a slow but steady tugboat to move these birds into either a correct orbit or even move them so the ISS could be used as a refurbing station would be the most cost effective solution.

    Personally i say anything that cuts down on the amount of useless space crap we have in orbit is a damned good thing, so I wish them nothing but luck.

    --
    ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 31 2014, @10:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 31 2014, @10:23PM (#87937)

    launching small payloads into space on their own is horribly inefficient. that's why most micros hitch a ride with the big boys.

    finding a launch window to establish an orbit intersecting an existing low earth orbiting satellite with nothing but an ion drive seems technically impossible, but i haven't dealt with orbital mechanics for a while.

    makes for good hype though, and any hype for privatization of the space industry has got to be good since governments are going broke all over the world and usually never engage in anything beyond military applications anyway (even if they appear on the surface to be civil/scientific).

    planning and talk is cheap, and applications in space are also relatively cheap. when someone solves the problem of cheap, regular, reliable and safe access to low earth orbit from ground, then they will be truly deserving of as much hype as space fanatics everywhere can muster.

    my personal opinion is that mixing conventional turbofan technology with efficient aerospike rocket nozzle design and a development approach similar to that applied in early x projects (low cost, low bureaucracy, limited goals, etc) has the best chance, and a not-for-profit r&d org supported financially by subsidiary enterprises might have a decent chance, but regardless of how its done won't happen for the time being due to unfavorable socioeconomic conditions (space just isn't a priority for most people atm).