Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday March 26 2020, @06:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the eminent-domain dept.

Internet sage says he'll sell 14,000,000 IPv4 addresses worth $300m, plow it into Asia-Pacific connectivity:

Special report Internet "samurai" and IPv6 advocate Jun Murai announced today he will sell more than 14 million IPv4 addresses and put the proceeds – expected to top US$300m – into a new trust co-owned by Asia-Pacific regional internet registry (RIR) APNIC.

Writing on the website for the organization that Murai founded in 1985 and which owns the addresses, the WIDE Project in Japan, Murai explained: "I have taken a decision to release this address block, for the purpose toward healthy development of today's internet services and toward supporting internet development in the AP [Asia-Pacific] region."

For the curious, the IPv4 addresses in question are vast majority of 43/8, or the addresses 43.*.*.*. Some are already allocated, and Murai owns 87.5 per cent of it, which he is now offloading.

Despite his revered status among internet engineers – Murai is the Japanese equivalent of "father of the internet" Vint Cerf and has been instrumental in internet development in Japan and across the Asia-Pacific region – the decision may prove controversial.

Under rules agreed by all five RIRs, any spare IPv4 addresses are supposed to be returned, for free, to the RIR and be redistributed as needed. But Murai received his address blocks in the early internet days before the rules were put in place, and so is pretty much free to do what he likes with them.

The enormous scarcity in such 32-bit network addresses has given them significant market value: currently each IPv4 address is worth between $20 and $30 apiece, meaning that Murai's seven-eights of a /8 address block, representing 14.7 million addresses, is worth anywhere between $294m and $441m.

It is almost unheard of for such a large block of essentially unused addresses to be sold, and competition is likely to be fierce among giant internet companies, such as Google, Facebook, as well as cable giants and multinational mobile operators who are struggling to deal with demand for IPv4 addresses from customers.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by zoward on Thursday March 26 2020, @07:36PM (3 children)

    by zoward (4734) on Thursday March 26 2020, @07:36PM (#976047)

    As I understand it, almost all of the large ISPs in the U.S. don't support IPv6 yet. I occasionally look in on mine (Charter), but they won't provide it until they feel they have to.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 26 2020, @09:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 26 2020, @09:23PM (#976086)

    Odd, I have Charter as well and have had ipv6 support for a while. At least my router reports a global ipv6 address on its wan port and it appears to be functional (ping6 works...) and test-ipv6.com works from one properly configured machine behind the router.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 27 2020, @03:30AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 27 2020, @03:30AM (#976203)

    IPv6 works fine on AT&T. You just can't run only IPv6, because a slowly shrinking number of websites don't support it/don't have infrastructure that supports tunneling.

  • (Score: 1) by ncc74656 on Friday March 27 2020, @06:23AM

    by ncc74656 (4917) on Friday March 27 2020, @06:23AM (#976220) Homepage
    Cox supports it, FWIW.